<p>In this article, we investigate the relationships among Ahlfors <i>n</i>-regular domains, <InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="11785_2025_1732_Article_IEq1.gif" Format="GIF" Height="18" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="33" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({\dot{V}}^{s,\phi }\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msup> <mrow> <mover accent="true"> <mi>V</mi> <mo>˙</mo> </mover> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>s</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mi>ϕ</mi> </mrow> </msup> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>-extension domains, and <InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="11785_2025_1732_Article_IEq1.gif" Format="GIF" Height="18" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="33" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({\dot{V}}^{s,\phi }\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msup> <mrow> <mover accent="true"> <mi>V</mi> <mo>˙</mo> </mover> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>s</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mi>ϕ</mi> </mrow> </msup> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>-embedding domains. Specifically, we prove that if <InlineEquation ID="IEq3"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="11785_2025_1732_Article_IEq3.gif" Format="GIF" Height="14" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="13" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\Omega \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> is an Ahlfors <i>n</i>-regular domain, then it is also a <InlineEquation ID="IEq4"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="11785_2025_1732_Article_IEq1.gif" Format="GIF" Height="18" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="33" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({\dot{V}}^{s,\phi }\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msup> <mrow> <mover accent="true"> <mi>V</mi> <mo>˙</mo> </mover> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>s</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mi>ϕ</mi> </mrow> </msup> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>-extension domain. Furthermore, assuming that <InlineEquation ID="IEq5"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="11785_2025_1732_Article_IEq5.gif" Format="GIF" Height="17" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="16" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\phi \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi>ϕ</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> is doubling with <InlineEquation ID="IEq6"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="11785_2025_1732_Article_IEq6.gif" Format="GIF" Height="22" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="160" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(K_\phi \in [1, 2^{\frac{n}{s}}) \cup (2^{\frac{n}{s}}, \infty ) \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <msub> <mi>K</mi> <mi>ϕ</mi> </msub> <mo>∈</mo> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">[</mo> <mn>1</mn> <mo>,</mo> <msup> <mn>2</mn> <mfrac> <mi>n</mi> <mi>s</mi> </mfrac> </msup> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> <mo>∪</mo> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <msup> <mn>2</mn> <mfrac> <mi>n</mi> <mi>s</mi> </mfrac> </msup> <mo>,</mo> <mi>∞</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, we establish that every <InlineEquation ID="IEq7"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="11785_2025_1732_Article_IEq1.gif" Format="GIF" Height="18" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="33" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({\dot{V}}^{s,\phi }\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msup> <mrow> <mover accent="true"> <mi>V</mi> <mo>˙</mo> </mover> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>s</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mi>ϕ</mi> </mrow> </msup> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>-extension domain is a <InlineEquation ID="IEq8"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="11785_2025_1732_Article_IEq1.gif" Format="GIF" Height="18" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="33" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({\dot{V}}^{s,\phi }\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msup> <mrow> <mover accent="true"> <mi>V</mi> <mo>˙</mo> </mover> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>s</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mi>ϕ</mi> </mrow> </msup> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>-embedding domain. Additionally, under the doubling condition, we demonstrate that every <InlineEquation ID="IEq9"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="11785_2025_1732_Article_IEq1.gif" Format="GIF" Height="18" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="33" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({\dot{V}}^{s,\phi }\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msup> <mrow> <mover accent="true"> <mi>V</mi> <mo>˙</mo> </mover> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>s</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mi>ϕ</mi> </mrow> </msup> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>-embedding domain is an Ahlfors <i>n</i>-regular domain. Consequently, under the doubling property with <InlineEquation ID="IEq10"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="11785_2025_1732_Article_IEq10.gif" Format="GIF" Height="22" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="160" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(K_\phi \in [1,2^{\frac{n}{s}}) \cup (2^{\frac{n}{s}},\infty )\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <msub> <mi>K</mi> <mi>ϕ</mi> </msub> <mo>∈</mo> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">[</mo> <mn>1</mn> <mo>,</mo> <msup> <mn>2</mn> <mfrac> <mi>n</mi> <mi>s</mi> </mfrac> </msup> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> <mo>∪</mo> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <msup> <mn>2</mn> <mfrac> <mi>n</mi> <mi>s</mi> </mfrac> </msup> <mo>,</mo> <mi>∞</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, we conclude that the classes of Ahlfors <i>n</i>-regular domains, <InlineEquation ID="IEq11"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="11785_2025_1732_Article_IEq1.gif" Format="GIF" Height="18" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="33" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({\dot{V}}^{s,\phi }\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msup> <mrow> <mover accent="true"> <mi>V</mi> <mo>˙</mo> </mover> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>s</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mi>ϕ</mi> </mrow> </msup> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>-extension domains, and <InlineEquation ID="IEq12"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="11785_2025_1732_Article_IEq1.gif" Format="GIF" Height="18" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="33" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({\dot{V}}^{s,\phi }\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msup> <mrow> <mover accent="true"> <mi>V</mi> <mo>˙</mo> </mover> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>s</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mi>ϕ</mi> </mrow> </msup> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>-embedding domains are equivalent.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Fractional Orlicz-Sobolev Extension via Ahlfors domains

  • Ning Chen,
  • Tian Liang

摘要

In this article, we investigate the relationships among Ahlfors n-regular domains, \({\dot{V}}^{s,\phi }\) V ˙ s , ϕ -extension domains, and \({\dot{V}}^{s,\phi }\) V ˙ s , ϕ -embedding domains. Specifically, we prove that if \(\Omega \) Ω is an Ahlfors n-regular domain, then it is also a \({\dot{V}}^{s,\phi }\) V ˙ s , ϕ -extension domain. Furthermore, assuming that \(\phi \) ϕ is doubling with \(K_\phi \in [1, 2^{\frac{n}{s}}) \cup (2^{\frac{n}{s}}, \infty ) \) K ϕ [ 1 , 2 n s ) ( 2 n s , ) , we establish that every \({\dot{V}}^{s,\phi }\) V ˙ s , ϕ -extension domain is a \({\dot{V}}^{s,\phi }\) V ˙ s , ϕ -embedding domain. Additionally, under the doubling condition, we demonstrate that every \({\dot{V}}^{s,\phi }\) V ˙ s , ϕ -embedding domain is an Ahlfors n-regular domain. Consequently, under the doubling property with \(K_\phi \in [1,2^{\frac{n}{s}}) \cup (2^{\frac{n}{s}},\infty )\) K ϕ [ 1 , 2 n s ) ( 2 n s , ) , we conclude that the classes of Ahlfors n-regular domains, \({\dot{V}}^{s,\phi }\) V ˙ s , ϕ -extension domains, and \({\dot{V}}^{s,\phi }\) V ˙ s , ϕ -embedding domains are equivalent.