<p>Pavement crack detection is a critical and challenging task in infrastructure maintenance. To address these challenges, we introduce EAF-Net (enhanced adaptive fusion network for superior crack detection). EAF-Net incorporates three advanced modules: the hybrid enhanced convolution module (HECM), the multi-branch attention module (MBAM), and the dynamic fusion module (DFM). The HECM leverages hybrid convolutional operations and adaptive feature weighting to capture detailed crack information. The MBAM enhances the model’s capability to process intricate crack patterns. The DFM dynamically integrates features from five network stages. We rigorously evaluate EAF-Net on three crack detection datasets: DeepCrack, Crack500, and CFD. Experimental results show that EAF-Net consistently outperforms existing methods across all datasets. Specifically, on the DeepCrack dataset, it achieves an F1 of 0.881 and an MIoU of 0.888; on the CFD dataset, it scores an F1 of 0.625 and an MIoU of 0.721; and on the Crack500 dataset, it gets an F1 of 0.754 and an MIoU of 0.787.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

EAF-Net: Enhanced Adaptive Fusion Network for Superior Crack Detection

  • Zhong Qu,
  • Zhao Gao,
  • Xuehui Yin

摘要

Pavement crack detection is a critical and challenging task in infrastructure maintenance. To address these challenges, we introduce EAF-Net (enhanced adaptive fusion network for superior crack detection). EAF-Net incorporates three advanced modules: the hybrid enhanced convolution module (HECM), the multi-branch attention module (MBAM), and the dynamic fusion module (DFM). The HECM leverages hybrid convolutional operations and adaptive feature weighting to capture detailed crack information. The MBAM enhances the model’s capability to process intricate crack patterns. The DFM dynamically integrates features from five network stages. We rigorously evaluate EAF-Net on three crack detection datasets: DeepCrack, Crack500, and CFD. Experimental results show that EAF-Net consistently outperforms existing methods across all datasets. Specifically, on the DeepCrack dataset, it achieves an F1 of 0.881 and an MIoU of 0.888; on the CFD dataset, it scores an F1 of 0.625 and an MIoU of 0.721; and on the Crack500 dataset, it gets an F1 of 0.754 and an MIoU of 0.787.