Scholarlink

<p>As firms face pressure to communicate about their environmental sustainability, effective messaging remains a challenge. Drawing on mental simulation theory, this research positions firms (rather than consumers) as mental simulation agents and examines how firms can effectively use process (e.g., “We deployed electric vehicles”) versus outcome (e.g., “We reduced our carbon footprint by 50%”) frames in their digital communication to increase consumer engagement with environmental posts (likes, shares, comments) and with firms (purchase intentions, investments). Across seven studies (four online experiments, a field experiment, secondary data comprising 12,311 environmental X posts by 110 U.S firms, and 533 crowdfunding eco-projects), we demonstrate that both frames increase engagement via distinct mechanisms, but using them jointly may backfire due to incongruence. When firms combine warmth expressions with process (but not outcome) frames, the effect on engagement is amplified. The use of competence expressions strengthens the effect on engagement with the post of both process and outcome frames, but only the effect of outcome frames on engagement with the firm.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Process and outcome frames in firms’ environmental posts and consumer engagement

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年7月22日

查看全文
  • Hai-Anh Tran,
  • Yuliya Strizhakova,
  • Guowei Huang,
  • Huy Tran,
  • Anders Gustafsson

摘要

As firms face pressure to communicate about their environmental sustainability, effective messaging remains a challenge. Drawing on mental simulation theory, this research positions firms (rather than consumers) as mental simulation agents and examines how firms can effectively use process (e.g., “We deployed electric vehicles”) versus outcome (e.g., “We reduced our carbon footprint by 50%”) frames in their digital communication to increase consumer engagement with environmental posts (likes, shares, comments) and with firms (purchase intentions, investments). Across seven studies (four online experiments, a field experiment, secondary data comprising 12,311 environmental X posts by 110 U.S firms, and 533 crowdfunding eco-projects), we demonstrate that both frames increase engagement via distinct mechanisms, but using them jointly may backfire due to incongruence. When firms combine warmth expressions with process (but not outcome) frames, the effect on engagement is amplified. The use of competence expressions strengthens the effect on engagement with the post of both process and outcome frames, but only the effect of outcome frames on engagement with the firm.