<p>Which political system is appropriate for China in the foreseeable future? In this dialogue between two scholars with different interpretations of the Confucian tradition, Z<span>hang</span> Qianfan 張千帆 argues that political leaders should be selected by means of electoral democracy, whereas Daniel A. Bell argues that they should be selected according to superior ability and virtue.&#xa0;They justify their arguments by appealing to contrasting views on human nature, political culture, and the role of the state, and draw some practical implications from Confucian-inspired moral and political theories.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Which Political System Is Appropriate for China? An Exchange on Electoral Democracy and Political Meritocracy

  • Daniel A. Bell,
  • Qianfan Zhang

摘要

Which political system is appropriate for China in the foreseeable future? In this dialogue between two scholars with different interpretations of the Confucian tradition, Zhang Qianfan 張千帆 argues that political leaders should be selected by means of electoral democracy, whereas Daniel A. Bell argues that they should be selected according to superior ability and virtue. They justify their arguments by appealing to contrasting views on human nature, political culture, and the role of the state, and draw some practical implications from Confucian-inspired moral and political theories.