Scholarlink

<p>Multimodal, opioid-sparing analgesia is central to enhanced recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RALP), yet the incremental value of altering the timing of non-opioid fixed-dose combinations within standardized pathways is uncertain. Using a public, de-identified dataset from a double-blind randomized trial, we performed a comprehensive secondary analysis emphasizing pain burden, trajectories, recovery, and tolerability. Adults undergoing RALP were randomized 1:1 to intravenous acetaminophen 1,000 mg plus ibuprofen 300 mg administered either before incision (preemptive) or at the end of surgery (preventive). The primary endpoint was rest pain burden across 2–48 h, operationalized as the area under the curve (AUC) of numeric rating scale scores. Secondary endpoints included cough pain, opioid consumption, QoR-15 K recovery at 24 h, rescue analgesia, adverse effects, and postoperative day 1 laboratory changes. Linear mixed-effects models analyzed repeated measures. An exploratory elastic-net logistic regression evaluated predictors of high 24-h fentanyl use. Among 152 participants (76 per group), rest pain burden showed no statistically significant between-group difference (mean difference − 6.7, 95% CI − 21.7 to 7.3; Cohen’s d = − 0.14; P = 0.378). Cumulative fentanyl AUC was not significantly different between groups (P = 0.247; SMD = − 0.22). QoR-15 K at 24 h showed no statistically significant difference (mean difference − 3.6, 95% CI − 10.2 to 3.0; P = 0.280). Creatinine change from baseline to postoperative day 1 was similar between groups (P = 0.333). Exploratory prediction of high opioid use (≥ 520 µg) achieved good discrimination (cross-validated AUC 0.84); however, top predictors included postoperative variables, indicating time-ordering leakage that limits prospective clinical utility. Preemptive versus preventive timing of intravenous acetaminophen/ibuprofen was associated with similar observed opioid consumption, rest pain burden, and early recovery within the precision of this sample. These findings are consistent with comparable short-term outcomes across timing strategies; however, the study was not designed as an equivalence trial, and small clinically meaningful differences cannot be excluded.</p><p><b>Trial registration:</b> The dataset derives from a double-blind randomized controlled trial registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05685342). This manuscript reports a secondary analysis of the public de-identified dataset.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Preemptive versus preventive intravenous acetaminophen/ibuprofen fixed-dose combination after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a comprehensive secondary analysis of a public double-blind randomized dataset

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年3月6日

查看全文
  • Hamada Ahmed Youssof ,
  • Atef A. Hassan,
  • Ahmed Abdel-Galil Saleh,
  • Ahmed Shafiea,
  • Ahmed Mostafa Mohammed,
  • Ahmed S. Elsayed,
  • Mohamed ElSayed Metwally,
  • Nader A. Abdelkhalek,
  • Gamal M. Hassan,
  • Mohamed Fathy Elebiary,
  • Ahmed Ali Lotfy,
  • Ahmed Sharawy

摘要

Multimodal, opioid-sparing analgesia is central to enhanced recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RALP), yet the incremental value of altering the timing of non-opioid fixed-dose combinations within standardized pathways is uncertain. Using a public, de-identified dataset from a double-blind randomized trial, we performed a comprehensive secondary analysis emphasizing pain burden, trajectories, recovery, and tolerability. Adults undergoing RALP were randomized 1:1 to intravenous acetaminophen 1,000 mg plus ibuprofen 300 mg administered either before incision (preemptive) or at the end of surgery (preventive). The primary endpoint was rest pain burden across 2–48 h, operationalized as the area under the curve (AUC) of numeric rating scale scores. Secondary endpoints included cough pain, opioid consumption, QoR-15 K recovery at 24 h, rescue analgesia, adverse effects, and postoperative day 1 laboratory changes. Linear mixed-effects models analyzed repeated measures. An exploratory elastic-net logistic regression evaluated predictors of high 24-h fentanyl use. Among 152 participants (76 per group), rest pain burden showed no statistically significant between-group difference (mean difference − 6.7, 95% CI − 21.7 to 7.3; Cohen’s d = − 0.14; P = 0.378). Cumulative fentanyl AUC was not significantly different between groups (P = 0.247; SMD = − 0.22). QoR-15 K at 24 h showed no statistically significant difference (mean difference − 3.6, 95% CI − 10.2 to 3.0; P = 0.280). Creatinine change from baseline to postoperative day 1 was similar between groups (P = 0.333). Exploratory prediction of high opioid use (≥ 520 µg) achieved good discrimination (cross-validated AUC 0.84); however, top predictors included postoperative variables, indicating time-ordering leakage that limits prospective clinical utility. Preemptive versus preventive timing of intravenous acetaminophen/ibuprofen was associated with similar observed opioid consumption, rest pain burden, and early recovery within the precision of this sample. These findings are consistent with comparable short-term outcomes across timing strategies; however, the study was not designed as an equivalence trial, and small clinically meaningful differences cannot be excluded.

Trial registration: The dataset derives from a double-blind randomized controlled trial registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05685342). This manuscript reports a secondary analysis of the public de-identified dataset.