Scholarlink

<p>Pelvic fractures, often caused by high-energy trauma, represent a significant challenge in orthopaedic practice. TiRobot-assisted minimally invasive surgery has emerged as a promising alternative, offering precise and navigated percutaneous fixation. However, robust evidence comparing its clinical efficacy with traditional methods is limited. This meta-analysis systematically reviewed studies comparing TiRobot-assisted surgery with conventional surgical techniques for pelvic fractures. Databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies published until December 1, 2025. Eleven studies, including randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies, were included. Primary outcomes assessed were perioperative parameters, functional recovery, safety, and healthcare costs. Pooled analyses showed that TiRobot-assisted surgery was significantly associated with shorter operative times, lower intraoperative blood loss, fewer fluoroscopic exposures, and fewer drilling attempts compared with conventional surgery. Additionally, the TiRobot-assisted group demonstrated a lower screw malposition rate and reduced overall complication rates. Functional outcomes, measured by Majeed pelvic scores, were superior in the TiRobot-assisted group. However, direct medical costs were higher for TiRobot-assisted surgery. In conclusion, TiRobot-assisted surgery offers substantial advantages in managing pelvic fractures, optimizing perioperative efficiency, screw placement accuracy, and functional recovery, while reducing complications. Despite higher initial costs, TiRobot-assisted surgery presents a highly valuable minimally invasive option, particularly for complex and unstable pelvic fractures.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Comprehensive clinical outcomes of TiRobot-assisted minimally invasive surgery for pelvic fractures: a meta-analysis

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2026年2月3日

查看全文
  • Yifan Yin,
  • Guohang Shen,
  • Ruoyan Wang,
  • Huiling Chen,
  • Kaiyong Wang,
  • Yang Chen,
  • Yupei Dai

摘要

Pelvic fractures, often caused by high-energy trauma, represent a significant challenge in orthopaedic practice. TiRobot-assisted minimally invasive surgery has emerged as a promising alternative, offering precise and navigated percutaneous fixation. However, robust evidence comparing its clinical efficacy with traditional methods is limited. This meta-analysis systematically reviewed studies comparing TiRobot-assisted surgery with conventional surgical techniques for pelvic fractures. Databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies published until December 1, 2025. Eleven studies, including randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies, were included. Primary outcomes assessed were perioperative parameters, functional recovery, safety, and healthcare costs. Pooled analyses showed that TiRobot-assisted surgery was significantly associated with shorter operative times, lower intraoperative blood loss, fewer fluoroscopic exposures, and fewer drilling attempts compared with conventional surgery. Additionally, the TiRobot-assisted group demonstrated a lower screw malposition rate and reduced overall complication rates. Functional outcomes, measured by Majeed pelvic scores, were superior in the TiRobot-assisted group. However, direct medical costs were higher for TiRobot-assisted surgery. In conclusion, TiRobot-assisted surgery offers substantial advantages in managing pelvic fractures, optimizing perioperative efficiency, screw placement accuracy, and functional recovery, while reducing complications. Despite higher initial costs, TiRobot-assisted surgery presents a highly valuable minimally invasive option, particularly for complex and unstable pelvic fractures.