Scholarlink

Background <p>Bladder cancer is a common malignancy in both sexes. Robot-assisted approaches are increasingly used in its surgical management. Radical cystectomy can significantly affect health-related quality of life (HRQoL), typically assessed using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) that capture patients’ physical, psychological, and social well-being.</p> Objectives <p>To systematically compare HRQoL and functional outcomes following robot-assisted versus open radical cystectomy (RARC vs. ORC) for bladder cancer, and to evaluate the methodologies employed, including PROMs and postoperative assessment timepoints.</p> Methods <p>A systematic search of CENTRAL, Embase, PubMed, and Scopus (2000–2025) was performed for randomised and non-randomised studies comparing HRQoL outcomes after RARC and ORC. Eligible studies reporting PROM-based HRQoL were included. Data were extracted on patient characteristics, PROMs, and outcome domains, and synthesised descriptively.</p> Results <p>Nine studies involving 1,575 patients met inclusion criteria. Seven HRQoL domains were identified, assessed using 18 PROMs; the EORTC QLQ-C30 was most frequently applied (<i>n</i> = 4). HRQoL was typically assessed at 3, 6, and 12 months, with only one study extending beyond 12 months. Functional assessment was limited: one study employed the Internation Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) for male erectile function, none assessed female sexual function, and one reported objective continence outcomes. Across studies, no statistically significant differences in HRQoL were observed between RARC and ORC. However, heterogeneity in PROMs, inconsistent outcome reporting, and high risk of bias limited comparability.</p> Conclusions <p>Current evidence does not demonstrate a HRQoL advantage of RARC over ORC. Standardisation of PROMs, consistent follow-up intervals, and inclusion of functional domains are essential to strengthen comparative evidence and inform the role of RARC as a potential new standard of care.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Comparing quality of life after robot assisted versus open radical cystectomy: A systematic review

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年10月27日

查看全文
  • Daniel Andrew Hawkins,
  • Mauro Camacho,
  • Gauri Godbole,
  • Chiara Dell’Oro,
  • Kingsley Ewool,
  • Md Rezaul Karim,
  • Bijendra Patel

摘要

Background

Bladder cancer is a common malignancy in both sexes. Robot-assisted approaches are increasingly used in its surgical management. Radical cystectomy can significantly affect health-related quality of life (HRQoL), typically assessed using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) that capture patients’ physical, psychological, and social well-being.

Objectives

To systematically compare HRQoL and functional outcomes following robot-assisted versus open radical cystectomy (RARC vs. ORC) for bladder cancer, and to evaluate the methodologies employed, including PROMs and postoperative assessment timepoints.

Methods

A systematic search of CENTRAL, Embase, PubMed, and Scopus (2000–2025) was performed for randomised and non-randomised studies comparing HRQoL outcomes after RARC and ORC. Eligible studies reporting PROM-based HRQoL were included. Data were extracted on patient characteristics, PROMs, and outcome domains, and synthesised descriptively.

Results

Nine studies involving 1,575 patients met inclusion criteria. Seven HRQoL domains were identified, assessed using 18 PROMs; the EORTC QLQ-C30 was most frequently applied (n = 4). HRQoL was typically assessed at 3, 6, and 12 months, with only one study extending beyond 12 months. Functional assessment was limited: one study employed the Internation Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) for male erectile function, none assessed female sexual function, and one reported objective continence outcomes. Across studies, no statistically significant differences in HRQoL were observed between RARC and ORC. However, heterogeneity in PROMs, inconsistent outcome reporting, and high risk of bias limited comparability.

Conclusions

Current evidence does not demonstrate a HRQoL advantage of RARC over ORC. Standardisation of PROMs, consistent follow-up intervals, and inclusion of functional domains are essential to strengthen comparative evidence and inform the role of RARC as a potential new standard of care.