Scholarlink

Background and Objective <p>Benign ureteroenteric stricture (UES) is a well-documented long-term complication that can occur after radical cystectomy with urinary diversion (UD). This meta-analysis evaluates the safety and feasibility of Robotic-assisted Ureteroenteric Reimplantation (RUER), with a focus on distinguishing outcomes between Open Ureteroenteric Reimplantation (OUER) and RUER.</p> Methods <p>We performed an extensive search across multiple databases, including PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, to identify studies that assessed outcomes for RUER alone or in comparison to OUER. Relevant data were systematically extracted and recorded in an Excel sheet. Data analysis was performed using OpenMeta [Analyst] and Review Manager Software.</p> Results <p>This review included 277 UES patients (244 RUER, 33 OUER) with 289 and 35 reimplantations, respectively. RUER had 91.7% success rate and a 7.1% stricture recurrence rate. Intraoperative complications, Clavien-Dindo ≥3 complications, conversion to open approach, and hospital readmission rates were 2.3%, 9.5%, 2.5%, and 7.8%, respectively. Compared to OUER, RUER showed similar success (RR =1.01, p=0.83) and stricture recurrence rates (RR = 0.89, p=0.72) but significantly lower intraoperative (RR =0.13, p=0.01), postoperative (RR = 0.53, p = 0.004), and Clavien-Dindo ≥3 complications (RR =0.27, p =0.01). RUER significantly reduced hospital stay (MD = -3.18 days, p = 0.0002) but showed no significant reduction in operative time (MD= -24.98 min, p=0.29).</p> Conclusions <p>RUER offers comparable success to OUER with significantly lower complication rates and shorter hospital stays, making it a safe and feasible minimally invasive alternative for strictures ranging from 1 to 3 cm.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Robotic-assisted ureteroenteric reimplantation for ureteroenteric stricture after radical cystectomy: a systematic review and dual meta-analysis

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年7月6日

查看全文
  • Reham Ramadan,
  • Mohamed Tharwat,
  • Abdelwahab Hashem,
  • Diaa-Eldin Taha

摘要

Background and Objective

Benign ureteroenteric stricture (UES) is a well-documented long-term complication that can occur after radical cystectomy with urinary diversion (UD). This meta-analysis evaluates the safety and feasibility of Robotic-assisted Ureteroenteric Reimplantation (RUER), with a focus on distinguishing outcomes between Open Ureteroenteric Reimplantation (OUER) and RUER.

Methods

We performed an extensive search across multiple databases, including PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, to identify studies that assessed outcomes for RUER alone or in comparison to OUER. Relevant data were systematically extracted and recorded in an Excel sheet. Data analysis was performed using OpenMeta [Analyst] and Review Manager Software.

Results

This review included 277 UES patients (244 RUER, 33 OUER) with 289 and 35 reimplantations, respectively. RUER had 91.7% success rate and a 7.1% stricture recurrence rate. Intraoperative complications, Clavien-Dindo ≥3 complications, conversion to open approach, and hospital readmission rates were 2.3%, 9.5%, 2.5%, and 7.8%, respectively. Compared to OUER, RUER showed similar success (RR =1.01, p=0.83) and stricture recurrence rates (RR = 0.89, p=0.72) but significantly lower intraoperative (RR =0.13, p=0.01), postoperative (RR = 0.53, p = 0.004), and Clavien-Dindo ≥3 complications (RR =0.27, p =0.01). RUER significantly reduced hospital stay (MD = -3.18 days, p = 0.0002) but showed no significant reduction in operative time (MD= -24.98 min, p=0.29).

Conclusions

RUER offers comparable success to OUER with significantly lower complication rates and shorter hospital stays, making it a safe and feasible minimally invasive alternative for strictures ranging from 1 to 3 cm.