Scholarlink

<p>To compare the safety and effectiveness of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery and traditional laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of giant pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas (PPGL). A retrospective analysis was conducted using the data of patients who underwent surgery at our institution between January 2013 and November 2023 and whose postoperative pathological examination confirmed PPGL (<i>n</i> = 84). Patients were divided into the robot-assisted (<i>n</i> = 33) and laparoscopic (<i>n</i> = 51) groups. Baseline data and intraoperative and postoperative recovery conditions of the two groups were compared. There was no significant difference in the baseline data between the two groups. The time to resume food intake in the robot-assisted group was shorter than that in the laparoscopic group [2 (1–2) vs. 3 (2–3) days, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001], and the incidence of postoperative morbidity was also lower (15.2% vs. 43.1%, <i>p</i> = 0.009); however, operating room time was longer [265 (240–370) vs. 245 (205–297.5) min, <i>p</i> = 0.039], and overall hospitalization costs were higher [80336.38 (72,014.3–101,555.39) vs. 60,102.13 (43,059.205–88085.35) CNY, <i>p</i> = 0.003]. This study results indicate that robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery has a lower postoperative complication rate and faster postoperative gastrointestinal function recovery. However, the surgery is costlier and operating room time is longer than with traditional laparoscopic surgery. Robotic surgery can be considered for giant PPGL if the patient’s financial condition permits.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Retrospective analysis of robotic versus laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of giant pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2025年5月7日

查看全文
  • Jingke He,
  • Yunfan Li,
  • Kun Han,
  • Shuai Su,
  • Jue Wang,
  • Wanqiao Wang,
  • Shuang Sun,
  • Yu Luo,
  • Jindong Zhang,
  • Delin Wang

摘要

To compare the safety and effectiveness of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery and traditional laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of giant pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas (PPGL). A retrospective analysis was conducted using the data of patients who underwent surgery at our institution between January 2013 and November 2023 and whose postoperative pathological examination confirmed PPGL (n = 84). Patients were divided into the robot-assisted (n = 33) and laparoscopic (n = 51) groups. Baseline data and intraoperative and postoperative recovery conditions of the two groups were compared. There was no significant difference in the baseline data between the two groups. The time to resume food intake in the robot-assisted group was shorter than that in the laparoscopic group [2 (1–2) vs. 3 (2–3) days, p < 0.001], and the incidence of postoperative morbidity was also lower (15.2% vs. 43.1%, p = 0.009); however, operating room time was longer [265 (240–370) vs. 245 (205–297.5) min, p = 0.039], and overall hospitalization costs were higher [80336.38 (72,014.3–101,555.39) vs. 60,102.13 (43,059.205–88085.35) CNY, p = 0.003]. This study results indicate that robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery has a lower postoperative complication rate and faster postoperative gastrointestinal function recovery. However, the surgery is costlier and operating room time is longer than with traditional laparoscopic surgery. Robotic surgery can be considered for giant PPGL if the patient’s financial condition permits.