<p>Smartphones have become widely adopted as tools for enhancing the sensitivity and usability of microfluidic paper-based analytical devices (<InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\mu PADs\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>) through high-resolution imaging, real-time data processing and reduced reagent consumption. However, their performance is often affected by many factors such as device parameters and lighting conditions. Addressing these may add cost and complexity, undermining on-site simplicity and affordability. The current work focuses on identifying optimal colour spaces for reducing these effects and improve accuracy of the estimated results. Bromocresol Green method and Biuret method were used for Albumin and Total protein respectively. These tests were optimized for paper microfluidics and images were captured and analyzed using a smartphone. Coefficient of determination (<InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\hbox {R}^{2}\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>) analysis revealed that <InlineEquation ID="IEq3"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\Delta E_{00}\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> in CIELAB space best correlated with analyte concentration (<InlineEquation ID="IEq4"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\hbox {R}^{2}\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> = 0.9785 for total protein, 0.9179 for albumin). Limit of detection (LOD) of <InlineEquation ID="IEq5"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(0.236\text { g/dl}\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> and <InlineEquation ID="IEq6"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(0.31\text { g/dl}\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> for total protein and albumin respectively were achieved using the <InlineEquation ID="IEq7"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\Delta E_{00}\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. Hence, <InlineEquation ID="IEq8"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\Delta E_{00}\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> and CIELAB are recommended as the optimal colour space for smartphone readouts of these biochemical assays on microfluidic paper-based analytical devices.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Influence of colour-format on colorimetric analysis of biochemical assays on microfluidic paper-based analytical devices: a smartphone-assisted approach

  • K. Nakul Shetty,
  • Somashekara Bhat,
  • Anirudh Kamath,
  • R. Shruthi,
  • S. A. Bharadwaj Amith,
  • P. Revathi Shenoy

摘要

Smartphones have become widely adopted as tools for enhancing the sensitivity and usability of microfluidic paper-based analytical devices ( \(\mu PADs\) ) through high-resolution imaging, real-time data processing and reduced reagent consumption. However, their performance is often affected by many factors such as device parameters and lighting conditions. Addressing these may add cost and complexity, undermining on-site simplicity and affordability. The current work focuses on identifying optimal colour spaces for reducing these effects and improve accuracy of the estimated results. Bromocresol Green method and Biuret method were used for Albumin and Total protein respectively. These tests were optimized for paper microfluidics and images were captured and analyzed using a smartphone. Coefficient of determination ( \(\hbox {R}^{2}\) ) analysis revealed that \(\Delta E_{00}\) in CIELAB space best correlated with analyte concentration ( \(\hbox {R}^{2}\) = 0.9785 for total protein, 0.9179 for albumin). Limit of detection (LOD) of \(0.236\text { g/dl}\) and \(0.31\text { g/dl}\) for total protein and albumin respectively were achieved using the \(\Delta E_{00}\) . Hence, \(\Delta E_{00}\) and CIELAB are recommended as the optimal colour space for smartphone readouts of these biochemical assays on microfluidic paper-based analytical devices.