Background <p>This study evaluated the association between staple line reinforcement (SLR) and 30-day outcomes in patients undergoing laparoscopic (LSG) or robotic sleeve gastrectomy (RSG).</p> Methods <p>Adults undergoing primary LSG or RSG with and without SLR were analyzed from the 2018–2019 Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement (MBSAQIP) database. Baseline characteristic differences by SLR status for LSG and RSG were adjusted using entropy balancing. Multivariable weighted logistic and linear regression was then performed to examine the association between SLR and primary and secondary outcomes.</p> Results <p>Of 284,580 patients, 88.6% (<i>n</i> = 252,035) had LSG and 11.4% (<i>n</i> = 32,545) had RSG, of which 63.7% (<i>n</i> = 160,545) and 50.8% (<i>n</i> = 16,541) had SLR, respectively. Compared to LSG and RSG without SLR, both LSG and RSG with SLR encountered higher adjusted odds of emergency department visit (AOR 1.08, 95%CI 1.03–1.10, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001; AOR 1.10, 95%CI 1.01–1.20, <i>p</i> = 0.029, respectively) as well as lower adjusted odds of leakage (AOR 0.85, 95%CI 0.76–0.94, <i>p</i> = 0.002; AOR 0.71, 95%CI 0.54–0.92, <i>p</i> = 0.011, respectively) and gastrointestinal bleeding (AOR 0.79, 95%CI 0.77–0.91, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001; AOR 0.77, 95%CI 0.70–0.84, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001, respectively). LSG with SLR was also associated with greater odds of unplanned intubation (AOR 1.52, 95%CI 1.16–1.99, <i>p</i> = 0.002) and mechanical ventilation (AOR 1.74, 95%CI 1.22–2.50, <i>p</i> = 0.002). RSG with SLR was associated with higher odds of intraoperative conversion (AOR 1.71, 95%CI 1.15–2.54, <i>p</i> = 0.008), and lower odds of acute renal failure (AOR 0.27, 95%CI 0.11–0.65, <i>p</i> = 0.003).</p> Conclusions <p>This entropy-balanced analysis of the MBSAQIP registry demonstrated an overall association between SLR and lower postoperative leakage and bleeding after RSG and LSG.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Perioperative Outcomes of Staple Line Reinforcement During Laparoscopic and Robotic Sleeve Gastrectomy: An MBSAQIP Cohort Study of 284,580 Patients

  • Sebastian Leon,
  • Armaun D. Rouhi,
  • Sara P. Ginzberg,
  • Juan E. Perez,
  • Colleen M. Tewksbury,
  • Victoria M. Gershuni,
  • Maria S. Altieri,
  • Noel N. Williams,
  • Kristoffel R. Dumon

摘要

Background

This study evaluated the association between staple line reinforcement (SLR) and 30-day outcomes in patients undergoing laparoscopic (LSG) or robotic sleeve gastrectomy (RSG).

Methods

Adults undergoing primary LSG or RSG with and without SLR were analyzed from the 2018–2019 Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement (MBSAQIP) database. Baseline characteristic differences by SLR status for LSG and RSG were adjusted using entropy balancing. Multivariable weighted logistic and linear regression was then performed to examine the association between SLR and primary and secondary outcomes.

Results

Of 284,580 patients, 88.6% (n = 252,035) had LSG and 11.4% (n = 32,545) had RSG, of which 63.7% (n = 160,545) and 50.8% (n = 16,541) had SLR, respectively. Compared to LSG and RSG without SLR, both LSG and RSG with SLR encountered higher adjusted odds of emergency department visit (AOR 1.08, 95%CI 1.03–1.10, p < 0.001; AOR 1.10, 95%CI 1.01–1.20, p = 0.029, respectively) as well as lower adjusted odds of leakage (AOR 0.85, 95%CI 0.76–0.94, p = 0.002; AOR 0.71, 95%CI 0.54–0.92, p = 0.011, respectively) and gastrointestinal bleeding (AOR 0.79, 95%CI 0.77–0.91, p < 0.001; AOR 0.77, 95%CI 0.70–0.84, p < 0.001, respectively). LSG with SLR was also associated with greater odds of unplanned intubation (AOR 1.52, 95%CI 1.16–1.99, p = 0.002) and mechanical ventilation (AOR 1.74, 95%CI 1.22–2.50, p = 0.002). RSG with SLR was associated with higher odds of intraoperative conversion (AOR 1.71, 95%CI 1.15–2.54, p = 0.008), and lower odds of acute renal failure (AOR 0.27, 95%CI 0.11–0.65, p = 0.003).

Conclusions

This entropy-balanced analysis of the MBSAQIP registry demonstrated an overall association between SLR and lower postoperative leakage and bleeding after RSG and LSG.