ScholarLink (思领科)
错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

A Systematic Review to Summarise and Appraise the Reporting of Surgical Innovation: a Case Study in Robotic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2024年6月19日

查看全文
  • Marc M. Huttman,
  • Alexander N. Smith,
  • Harry F. Robertson,
  • Rory Purves,
  • Sarah E. Biggs,
  • Ffion Dewi,
  • Lauren K. Dixon,
  • Emily N. Kirkham,
  • Conor S. Jones,
  • Jozel Ramirez,
  • Darren L. Scroggie,
  • Samir Pathak,
  • Natalie S. Blencowe,
  • Barry Main,
  • Jane Blazeby,
  • Sarah Dawson,
  • Aimee Wilkinson,
  • Annabel Jones,
  • Aya Abbas,
  • Benedict Turner,
  • Charlie Thomas,
  • David Henshall,
  • Eleanor Boden,
  • Emma Gull,
  • Emma Sewart,
  • Fergus Wood,
  • Francesca Loro,
  • Freya Hollowood,
  • George Fowler,
  • George Higginbotham,
  • Grace Sellers,
  • Ioan Hughes,
  • Ishita Handa,
  • Lorna Leandro,
  • Louisa Paynter,
  • Lucy Huppler,
  • Lysander Gourbault,
  • Manuk Wijeyaratne,
  • Maximilian Dewhurst,
  • Max Shah,
  • Miraen Kiandee,
  • Mo Dada,
  • Oliver Brewster,
  • Pat Lok,
  • Rahul Winayak,
  • Reesha Ranat,
  • Ruby Lawrence,
  • Ryan Millar,
  • Sam Lawday,
  • Sanjush Dalmia,
  • Sophie Rozwadowski,
  • Tanya Robinson,
  • Teresa Perra,
  • Tjun Wei Leow,
  • Tom Brankin-Frisby,
  • William Baker,
  • William Hurst,
  • Ysabelle Embury-Young,
  • Abigail Vallance,
  • Amber Young,
  • Ben Zucker,
  • Christin Hoffmann,
  • Hollie Richards,
  • James Olivier,
  • Jonathan Rees,
  • Keng Siang Lee,
  • Rhiannon Macefield,
  • Sian Cousins

摘要

Robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RRYGB) is an innovative alternative to traditional laparoscopic approaches. Literature has been published investigating its safety/efficacy; however, the quality of reporting is uncertain. This systematic review used the Idea, Development, Exploration, Assessment and Long-term follow-up (IDEAL) framework to assess the reporting quality of available literature. A narrative summary was formulated, assessing how comprehensively governance/ethics, patient selection, demographics, surgeon expertise/training, technique description and outcomes were reported. Forty-seven studies published between 2005 and 2024 were included. There was incomplete/inconsistent reporting of governance/ethics, patient selection, surgeon expertise/training and technique description, with heterogenous outcome reporting. RRYGB reporting was poor and did not align with IDEAL guidance. Robust prospective studies reporting findings using IDEAL/other guidance are required to facilitate safe widespread adoption of RRYGB and other surgical innovations.