Scholarlink

<i>Summary</i> <p>Clinical audits are central to quality improvement in healthcare, yet practical real-world descriptions of how they are implemented, governed and sustained are limited. This paper describes the establishment, evolution and impact of the Irish Hip Fracture Database (IHFD) within the Irish healthcare system as an exemplar.</p> Introduction <p>Clinical audits compare clinical practice against defined standards to identify areas for improvement and showcase excellence. International literature provides limited insight into how they are governed and sustained. Using the IHFD, a mature national audit, this paper reviews its development, evolution and sustained momentum from 2013 to 2024.</p> Methods <p>Longitudinal data were captured via the Hospital Inpatient Enquiry (HIPE) system, encompassing all eligible Irish acute hospitals. Included cases were patients aged ≥ 60 years with hip fractures, as defined by IHFD. Three organisational surveys (2016, 2020, 2024) were undertaken to assess hospital resources, care pathways, governance structures and audit supports.</p> Results <p>In total, 41,304 cases were included in the analysis. National coverage exceeded 90% from 2017. Demographic characteristics remain consistent. Improvements in data quality, adherence to Irish Hip Fracture Standards were observed, including geriatrician assessment (11% in 2013 to 86% in 2024) and bone health assessment (65% in 2013 to 90% in 2024). Service reconfigurations and resourcing to support hip fracture care occurred over this period. Engagement with the audit remained robust despite major challenges including COVID-19, a national cyberattack and ongoing health system reform.</p> Conclusion <p>Sustained success of a national hip fracture clinical audit requires strong leadership, effective governance, clear clinical standards, accessible data and timely reporting. Continued relevance requires agility and alignment with evolving system needs.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

The development and evolution of the Irish Hip Fracture Database: a quality care initiative 2013–2024

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年6月25日

查看全文
  • L. Brent,
  • E. Ahern,
  • T. Murphy,
  • C. Hurson,
  • T. Coughlan,
  • P. Hickey,
  • C. Lodola,
  • M. E. Walsh,
  • E. Byrne,
  • F. Fitzpatrick

摘要

Summary

Clinical audits are central to quality improvement in healthcare, yet practical real-world descriptions of how they are implemented, governed and sustained are limited. This paper describes the establishment, evolution and impact of the Irish Hip Fracture Database (IHFD) within the Irish healthcare system as an exemplar.

Introduction

Clinical audits compare clinical practice against defined standards to identify areas for improvement and showcase excellence. International literature provides limited insight into how they are governed and sustained. Using the IHFD, a mature national audit, this paper reviews its development, evolution and sustained momentum from 2013 to 2024.

Methods

Longitudinal data were captured via the Hospital Inpatient Enquiry (HIPE) system, encompassing all eligible Irish acute hospitals. Included cases were patients aged ≥ 60 years with hip fractures, as defined by IHFD. Three organisational surveys (2016, 2020, 2024) were undertaken to assess hospital resources, care pathways, governance structures and audit supports.

Results

In total, 41,304 cases were included in the analysis. National coverage exceeded 90% from 2017. Demographic characteristics remain consistent. Improvements in data quality, adherence to Irish Hip Fracture Standards were observed, including geriatrician assessment (11% in 2013 to 86% in 2024) and bone health assessment (65% in 2013 to 90% in 2024). Service reconfigurations and resourcing to support hip fracture care occurred over this period. Engagement with the audit remained robust despite major challenges including COVID-19, a national cyberattack and ongoing health system reform.

Conclusion

Sustained success of a national hip fracture clinical audit requires strong leadership, effective governance, clear clinical standards, accessible data and timely reporting. Continued relevance requires agility and alignment with evolving system needs.