Scholarlink

<p>Different conceptions for dealing with the theory-practice problem can be complementary, even if they stem from different paradigms. The article argues that “transfer models,” which follow the idea that research knowledge can be comparatively directly implemented into action, are more suitable for low-complexity educational situations. In high-complexity situations, however, “transformation models” seem to be appropriate, which understand research knowledge as an interpretive offer that helps teachers to contextualize the situation and reflect on action options. A&#xa0;cognitive psychology conception of problems is used to distinguish between low- and high-complexity situations. Furthermore, two-process theories of thinking are drawn upon and shown to be suitable for describing teachers’ thinking when dealing with low- and high-complexity situations. The proposal is justified, explained, and discussed in connection with the concept of meta-reflectivity.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Wie Lehrkräfte Forschungswissen in niedrig- und hoch-komplexen Situationen nutzen können: Ein differenzieller Vorschlag

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年4月22日

查看全文
  • Manfred Hofer,
  • Sebastian Schmid,
  • Anne Seifert

摘要

Different conceptions for dealing with the theory-practice problem can be complementary, even if they stem from different paradigms. The article argues that “transfer models,” which follow the idea that research knowledge can be comparatively directly implemented into action, are more suitable for low-complexity educational situations. In high-complexity situations, however, “transformation models” seem to be appropriate, which understand research knowledge as an interpretive offer that helps teachers to contextualize the situation and reflect on action options. A cognitive psychology conception of problems is used to distinguish between low- and high-complexity situations. Furthermore, two-process theories of thinking are drawn upon and shown to be suitable for describing teachers’ thinking when dealing with low- and high-complexity situations. The proposal is justified, explained, and discussed in connection with the concept of meta-reflectivity.