Scholarlink

<p>The gap between educational research, practice, administration, and policy—often referred to as the research-practice gap—presents a&#xa0;major challenge for the education system. In Germany, this gap is being addressed by (federal) state-level educational institutes and quality agencies (LI/QE), which act as intermediary actors within the educational ecosystem. These institutions play a&#xa0;key role in supporting evidence-based decision-making, particularly through the provision of data and scientific findings. <i>Open Science Practices</i> can enhance the accessibility and transparency of such data and knowledge for various stakeholders. Drawing on the experience of the Institute for Educational Analyses Baden-Württemberg (IBBW), this article illustrates how <i>Open Methodology, Open Educational Resources, Open Data,</i> and <i>Open Access</i> can be implemented in practice. We highlight the potential of <i>Open Science</i> to reduce the research-practice gap, as well as specific challenges faced by LI/QE in this context.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Open-Science-Praktiken an Landesinstituten und Qualitätseinrichtungen der Länder – Chancen und Herausforderungen an der Schnittstelle zwischen Wissenschaft und Praxis

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年3月20日

查看全文
  • Lisa Birnbaum,
  • Alexandra Dehmel,
  • Nora Fröhlich,
  • Kerstin Norwig,
  • Juliane Rutsch,
  • Ulrike Rangel,
  • Benjamin Fauth

摘要

The gap between educational research, practice, administration, and policy—often referred to as the research-practice gap—presents a major challenge for the education system. In Germany, this gap is being addressed by (federal) state-level educational institutes and quality agencies (LI/QE), which act as intermediary actors within the educational ecosystem. These institutions play a key role in supporting evidence-based decision-making, particularly through the provision of data and scientific findings. Open Science Practices can enhance the accessibility and transparency of such data and knowledge for various stakeholders. Drawing on the experience of the Institute for Educational Analyses Baden-Württemberg (IBBW), this article illustrates how Open Methodology, Open Educational Resources, Open Data, and Open Access can be implemented in practice. We highlight the potential of Open Science to reduce the research-practice gap, as well as specific challenges faced by LI/QE in this context.