Scholarlink

Purpose <p>Medical career decisions are complex. Gender and racial disparities remain among internal medicine (IM) subspecialty fellows, particularly in procedural subspecialties. This qualitative study aims to thematically explore factors that influence IM resident subspecialty career choice, with a focus on factors specific to women and UIM trainees to better understand existing disparities. This is the first study to explore IM residents own stated reasons to subspecialize into various fields.</p> Methods <p>We conducted virtual focus groups with 37 IM residents from multiple institutions, organized by affinity groups based on self-identifying as UIM and non-UIM race or ethnicity. Thematic analysis using inductive coding was used to analyze the data and identify themes applying the Systems Theory Framework (STF) of career development. Key themes were divided into social or contextual factors, individual factors, or uncontrollable factors.</p> Results <p>Study participants were 45.9% women (<i>n</i> = 17) and 51.4% self-identified as UIM (<i>n</i> = 19). In this sample of graduating IM residents who have matched into subspeciality fellowships, contextual factors emerged as the most influential to their career choices. The main contributors to selecting a subspecialty were mentorship and role models, positive experiences and exposure to the field, work-life balance, enjoyment of clinical and/or procedural work, and financial compensation. UIM residents identified their communities and their personal identities (i.e., race, ethnicity, culture) as influential to their career choices. Both women and UIM residents more frequently described the importance of representation and belonging in their career decisions compared to their non-UIM and male counterparts. Family planning emerged as an important factor for women.</p> Conclusions <p>Our findings lend insights into how academic institutions, medicine subspecialty societies, training programs, and faculty at large can engage trainees in their field. We propose ways to improve the recruitment and retention of women and UIM trainees into the IM subspecialty fields.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

How do Internal Medicine Residents from Different Backgrounds Make Subspecialty Career Choices? A Qualitative Analysis

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年11月21日

查看全文
  • Blythe Butler,
  • Ana I. Velazquez,
  • Evelin Trejo,
  • Laura A. Huppert,
  • Gerald Hsu,
  • Jennifer M. Babik,
  • Lekshmi Santhosh

摘要

Purpose

Medical career decisions are complex. Gender and racial disparities remain among internal medicine (IM) subspecialty fellows, particularly in procedural subspecialties. This qualitative study aims to thematically explore factors that influence IM resident subspecialty career choice, with a focus on factors specific to women and UIM trainees to better understand existing disparities. This is the first study to explore IM residents own stated reasons to subspecialize into various fields.

Methods

We conducted virtual focus groups with 37 IM residents from multiple institutions, organized by affinity groups based on self-identifying as UIM and non-UIM race or ethnicity. Thematic analysis using inductive coding was used to analyze the data and identify themes applying the Systems Theory Framework (STF) of career development. Key themes were divided into social or contextual factors, individual factors, or uncontrollable factors.

Results

Study participants were 45.9% women (n = 17) and 51.4% self-identified as UIM (n = 19). In this sample of graduating IM residents who have matched into subspeciality fellowships, contextual factors emerged as the most influential to their career choices. The main contributors to selecting a subspecialty were mentorship and role models, positive experiences and exposure to the field, work-life balance, enjoyment of clinical and/or procedural work, and financial compensation. UIM residents identified their communities and their personal identities (i.e., race, ethnicity, culture) as influential to their career choices. Both women and UIM residents more frequently described the importance of representation and belonging in their career decisions compared to their non-UIM and male counterparts. Family planning emerged as an important factor for women.

Conclusions

Our findings lend insights into how academic institutions, medicine subspecialty societies, training programs, and faculty at large can engage trainees in their field. We propose ways to improve the recruitment and retention of women and UIM trainees into the IM subspecialty fields.