Scholarlink

Background <p>Artificial intelligence (AI) has significant potential to impact clinical decision-making and improve patient outcomes in outpatient primary care. However, despite rapid advancements, the extent of AI implementation in outpatient primary care remains unclear. This scoping review explores how AI functions, undergoes trials, or integrates into non-urgent outpatient primary care settings.</p> Methods <p>This scoping review was conducted in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and reported following the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews) guidelines. We searched MEDLINE, CINAHL, Scopus, and clinicaltrials.gov databases. Eligible studies were peer-reviewed articles published in English between January 2019 and November 22, 2024, examining AI applications in primary care settings with a direct focus on patient care. Studies were excluded if they were not in English, did not address primary care workflows, or if the full text was unavailable. We added clinicaltrials.gov to uncover active protocols that suggested wider potential adoption. We used thematic analysis to synthesize findings related to AI application domains, research stage, and status of implementation.</p> Results <p>We screened 3203 manuscripts and found 61 that met the eligibility criteria. Most studies (<i>n</i> = 26; 43%) focused on model development, while eight reported clinical trial results. AI applications included provider support (<i>n</i> = 5; 8%) and radiological disease diagnosis (<i>n</i> = 1; 2%). Most studies examined clinical decision-making, disease diagnosis, and risk prediction, but none addressed provider cognitive support, workflow automation, or risk-adjusted paneling. There were 11 studies of real-world implementations.</p> Conclusion <p>Overall, based on this scoping review of peer-reviewed literature, AI in primary care remains in the developmental stage, with minimal real-world use beyond ambient scribing, clinical decision support, and workflow automation.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Artificial Intelligence in Outpatient Primary Care: A Scoping Review on Applications, Challenges, and Future Directions

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年10月28日

查看全文
  • Stacy Iannone,
  • Amarpreet Kaur,
  • Kevin B. Johnson

摘要

Background

Artificial intelligence (AI) has significant potential to impact clinical decision-making and improve patient outcomes in outpatient primary care. However, despite rapid advancements, the extent of AI implementation in outpatient primary care remains unclear. This scoping review explores how AI functions, undergoes trials, or integrates into non-urgent outpatient primary care settings.

Methods

This scoping review was conducted in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and reported following the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews) guidelines. We searched MEDLINE, CINAHL, Scopus, and clinicaltrials.gov databases. Eligible studies were peer-reviewed articles published in English between January 2019 and November 22, 2024, examining AI applications in primary care settings with a direct focus on patient care. Studies were excluded if they were not in English, did not address primary care workflows, or if the full text was unavailable. We added clinicaltrials.gov to uncover active protocols that suggested wider potential adoption. We used thematic analysis to synthesize findings related to AI application domains, research stage, and status of implementation.

Results

We screened 3203 manuscripts and found 61 that met the eligibility criteria. Most studies (n = 26; 43%) focused on model development, while eight reported clinical trial results. AI applications included provider support (n = 5; 8%) and radiological disease diagnosis (n = 1; 2%). Most studies examined clinical decision-making, disease diagnosis, and risk prediction, but none addressed provider cognitive support, workflow automation, or risk-adjusted paneling. There were 11 studies of real-world implementations.

Conclusion

Overall, based on this scoping review of peer-reviewed literature, AI in primary care remains in the developmental stage, with minimal real-world use beyond ambient scribing, clinical decision support, and workflow automation.