Scholarlink

Background <p>Nearly 25% of women experience pelvic floor disorders, for which pelvic floor physical therapy (PFPT) is a first-line treatment. Within the Veterans Health Administration (VHA), only one-third of health care systems offer PFPT on site. Alternatives include receiving care from providers in the community (“Community Care”) or from VHA providers at a distant site via telehealth (“Clinical Resource Hub”). Little is known about Veterans’ experiences with these two PFPT care pathways.</p> Objective <p>To characterize women Veterans’ experiences with PFPT, including factors affecting access to and receipt of care.</p> Design <p>Using VHA data, we recruited and conducted semi-structured qualitative interviews with women Veterans who had received PFPT services within the last 6&#xa0;months.</p> Participants <p>We recruited <i>N</i> = 20 women Veterans from five VHA health care systems. Participants from four health care systems went through the Community Care pathway (<i>N</i> = 12), while participants from the fifth went through the Clinical Resource Hub (<i>N</i> = 8).</p> Approach <p>We recorded and auto-transcribed semi-structured interviews. Using structured interview summaries, we completed a two-step analysis process, first using rapid, team-based matrix analysis, followed by thematic analysis. We identified key themes and domains into which we organized those themes.</p> Key Results <p>We identified themes in three domains: barriers getting care, experiences of care, and barriers extending care. Veterans described barriers to receiving care initially, including a lack of knowledge, stigma, providers dismissing concerns, and referral challenges. Participants were generally satisfied with their care and experienced quality of life improvements. Most desired some in-person care. Patients wanting more care after completing initially approved visits faced additional administrative barriers, leading to symptom recurrence.</p> Conclusions <p>Findings about patient access barriers suggest provider training and education (including awareness of PFPT’s clinical benefits, referral pathways, and trauma-informed care), patient education, hybrid care modalities, expansion of the PFPT provider workforce, and streamlining referrals may improve access to PFPT among Veterans.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

A Qualitative Assessment of Pelvic Floor Physical Therapy Experiences for Women Veterans in VHA Care

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2025年6月6日

查看全文
  • Ashley C. Mog,
  • Jessica P. Young,
  • Jordan H. Mamkhezri,
  • Caroline Merkel,
  • Kristen E. Gray

摘要

Background

Nearly 25% of women experience pelvic floor disorders, for which pelvic floor physical therapy (PFPT) is a first-line treatment. Within the Veterans Health Administration (VHA), only one-third of health care systems offer PFPT on site. Alternatives include receiving care from providers in the community (“Community Care”) or from VHA providers at a distant site via telehealth (“Clinical Resource Hub”). Little is known about Veterans’ experiences with these two PFPT care pathways.

Objective

To characterize women Veterans’ experiences with PFPT, including factors affecting access to and receipt of care.

Design

Using VHA data, we recruited and conducted semi-structured qualitative interviews with women Veterans who had received PFPT services within the last 6 months.

Participants

We recruited N = 20 women Veterans from five VHA health care systems. Participants from four health care systems went through the Community Care pathway (N = 12), while participants from the fifth went through the Clinical Resource Hub (N = 8).

Approach

We recorded and auto-transcribed semi-structured interviews. Using structured interview summaries, we completed a two-step analysis process, first using rapid, team-based matrix analysis, followed by thematic analysis. We identified key themes and domains into which we organized those themes.

Key Results

We identified themes in three domains: barriers getting care, experiences of care, and barriers extending care. Veterans described barriers to receiving care initially, including a lack of knowledge, stigma, providers dismissing concerns, and referral challenges. Participants were generally satisfied with their care and experienced quality of life improvements. Most desired some in-person care. Patients wanting more care after completing initially approved visits faced additional administrative barriers, leading to symptom recurrence.

Conclusions

Findings about patient access barriers suggest provider training and education (including awareness of PFPT’s clinical benefits, referral pathways, and trauma-informed care), patient education, hybrid care modalities, expansion of the PFPT provider workforce, and streamlining referrals may improve access to PFPT among Veterans.