Scholarlink

Background <p>The SHARE Approach Model and training curriculum was developed by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) to teach clinicians practicing in diverse settings how to engage in more effective Shared Decision Making (SDM).</p> Objective <p>To determine the effectiveness of the SHARE Approach at improving SDM in practices located across Colorado, USA.</p> Design <p>A longitudinal study with pre- and post-intervention observations.</p> Participants <p>Primary care and cardiology practices were recruited from across Colorado. All practice staff were invited to participate in the SHARE Approach training. Patients and providers from these practices participated in SDM assessments.</p> Intervention <p>The 4-h SHARE Approach training was led by a practice facilitator and consisted of didactic lectures, demonstration videos, group discussion, and group activities.</p> Main Measures <p>Primary outcome measures included (1) evaluation of the training and confidence/understanding in doing SDM using a survey questionnaire of practice staff, (2) patient and clinician-reported SDM occurring in clinical encounters, and (3) SDM captured in audio recordings of a subset of clinical encounters. SDM was hypothesized to improve at post-intervention and maintain gains at follow-up.</p> Key Results <p>Ten primary care and two cardiology practices enrolled in the study, located across major regions of Colorado (e.g., Western slope; Eastern plains; front range) and representing diverse practice types (e.g., independent; health system; federally qualified health center). Trainee confidence and understanding of SDM and confidence in ability to engage in SDM improved at post-test and maintained gains at follow-up. Patient- and clinician-reported SDM occurring in clinical encounters did not improve significantly at post-intervention or follow-up. SDM observed on audio recordings did improve at the 6-month follow-up observation.</p> Conclusions <p>This study reports the largest and most comprehensive evaluation of AHRQ’s SHARE Approach training curriculum. The training was positively received by clinicians and may improve SDM behaviors in clinical practice.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Effectiveness of the SHARE Approach for Improving Clinician Shared Decision Making Skills: A Trial in 12 Practices Located in Colorado, USA

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2025年9月10日

查看全文
  • Laura D. Scherer,
  • Daniel Matlock,
  • Christopher Knoepke,
  • Robyn Wearner,
  • Allyson Gottsman,
  • Douglas Fernald,
  • W. Perry Dickinson,
  • L. Miriam Dickinson,
  • Monica McNulty,
  • Mark Gritz

摘要

Background

The SHARE Approach Model and training curriculum was developed by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) to teach clinicians practicing in diverse settings how to engage in more effective Shared Decision Making (SDM).

Objective

To determine the effectiveness of the SHARE Approach at improving SDM in practices located across Colorado, USA.

Design

A longitudinal study with pre- and post-intervention observations.

Participants

Primary care and cardiology practices were recruited from across Colorado. All practice staff were invited to participate in the SHARE Approach training. Patients and providers from these practices participated in SDM assessments.

Intervention

The 4-h SHARE Approach training was led by a practice facilitator and consisted of didactic lectures, demonstration videos, group discussion, and group activities.

Main Measures

Primary outcome measures included (1) evaluation of the training and confidence/understanding in doing SDM using a survey questionnaire of practice staff, (2) patient and clinician-reported SDM occurring in clinical encounters, and (3) SDM captured in audio recordings of a subset of clinical encounters. SDM was hypothesized to improve at post-intervention and maintain gains at follow-up.

Key Results

Ten primary care and two cardiology practices enrolled in the study, located across major regions of Colorado (e.g., Western slope; Eastern plains; front range) and representing diverse practice types (e.g., independent; health system; federally qualified health center). Trainee confidence and understanding of SDM and confidence in ability to engage in SDM improved at post-test and maintained gains at follow-up. Patient- and clinician-reported SDM occurring in clinical encounters did not improve significantly at post-intervention or follow-up. SDM observed on audio recordings did improve at the 6-month follow-up observation.

Conclusions

This study reports the largest and most comprehensive evaluation of AHRQ’s SHARE Approach training curriculum. The training was positively received by clinicians and may improve SDM behaviors in clinical practice.