错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Embedding Authorship Identity into a Portal-Based Agenda Setting Intervention to Support Older Adults and Care Partners

  • Hillary D. Lum,
  • Jessica Cassidy,
  • Chen-Tan Lin,
  • Catherine M. DesRoches,
  • Prajakta Shanbhag,
  • Kelly T. Gleason,
  • Danielle S. Powell,
  • Danielle Peereboom,
  • Catherine A. Riffin,
  • Jamie M. Smith,
  • Aleksandra Wec,
  • Jennifer L. Wolff

摘要

Background

Patients, families, and clinicians increasingly communicate through patient portals. Due to potential for multiple authors, clinicians need to know who is communicating with them. OurNotes is a portal-based pre-visit agenda setting questionnaire. This study adapted OurNotes to include a self-identification question to help clinicians interpret information authored by nonpatients.

Objectives

To describe adapted OurNotes use and clinician feedback to inform broader implementation.

Design

Evaluation of adapted OurNotes in a geriatric practice.

Participants

Older adults with a portal account and a clinic visit; eight clinicians were interviewed.

Intervention

OurNotes adaptation to clarify whether the author is the patient, the patient with help, or a nonpatient.

Approach

Cross-sectional chart review of OurNotes completion, patient characteristics, and visit topics by author type. Clinician interviews explored experiences with OurNotes.

Results

Out of 503 visits, 134 (26%) OurNotes questionnaires were completed. Most respondents (n = 92; 69%) identified as the patient, 18 (14%) identified as the patient with help, and 24 (17%) identified as someone other than the patient. On average, patients who authored their own OurNotes were younger (80.9 years) compared to patients who received assistance (85.8 years), or patients for whom someone else authored OurNotes (87.8 years) (p < 0.001). A diagnosis of cognitive impairment was present among 20% of patients who self-authored OurNotes vs. 79% of patients where someone else authored OurNotes (p < 0.001). Topics differed when OurNotes was authored by patients vs. nonpatients. Symptoms (52% patient vs. 83% nonpatient, p = 0.004), community resources (6% vs. 42%, p < 0.001), dementia (5% vs. 21%, p = 0.009), and care partner concerns (1% vs. 12%, p = 0.002) were more often mentioned by nonpatients. Clinicians valued the self-identification question for increasing transparency about who provided information.

Conclusions

A self-identification question can identify nonpatient authors of OurNotes. Future steps include evaluating whether transparency improves care quality, especially when care partners are involved.