Scholarlink

<p>I&#xa0;seek to restate and to develop a&#xa0;position I&#xa0;have previously taken up on the relation between description and causal explanation in sociology, in part by reference to an ongoing controversy on this matter in British sociology. I&#xa0;start out from the basic distinction between the causes of effects and the effects of causes, and from a&#xa0;more instructive controversy on the issues that arise that has occurred in epidemiology. Drawing on this, I&#xa0;emphasise three points: first, the importance of good description in sociology in its own right but also in establishing the social phenomena that call for explanation; second, the need for causal explanations to be given in terms of social processes or mechanisms, specified in terms of individual action and interaction which are capable of generating the <i>explananda</i>; and third, the necessity of moving on from description to explanation in this way if sociology is to take up the actually increasing scope that exists for it to contribute to effective social policy and also to an understanding of the possible limits of such policy.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Description, Causal Explanation, and Policy Intervention in Sociology

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年12月23日

查看全文
  • John H. Goldthorpe

摘要

I seek to restate and to develop a position I have previously taken up on the relation between description and causal explanation in sociology, in part by reference to an ongoing controversy on this matter in British sociology. I start out from the basic distinction between the causes of effects and the effects of causes, and from a more instructive controversy on the issues that arise that has occurred in epidemiology. Drawing on this, I emphasise three points: first, the importance of good description in sociology in its own right but also in establishing the social phenomena that call for explanation; second, the need for causal explanations to be given in terms of social processes or mechanisms, specified in terms of individual action and interaction which are capable of generating the explananda; and third, the necessity of moving on from description to explanation in this way if sociology is to take up the actually increasing scope that exists for it to contribute to effective social policy and also to an understanding of the possible limits of such policy.