<p>U-Net variants commonly encounter limitations due to overconfidence in predictions, impeding their clinical applicability. Quantifying model uncertainty accurately is vital, but obtaining sufficient and reliable evidence remains challenging. This paper introduces the <InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="11554_2025_1648_Article_IEq1.gif" Format="GIF" Height="14" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="16" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\textbf{D}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi mathvariant="bold">D</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>ual-Branch <InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="11554_2025_1648_Article_IEq2.gif" Format="GIF" Height="14" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="29" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\textbf{Evi}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi mathvariant="bold">Evi</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>dential Framework Fusing <InlineEquation ID="IEq3"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="11554_2025_1648_Article_IEq3.gif" Format="GIF" Height="14" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="16" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\textbf{H}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi mathvariant="bold">H</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>ard <InlineEquation ID="IEq4"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="11554_2025_1648_Article_IEq4.gif" Format="GIF" Height="14" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="14" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\textbf{E}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi mathvariant="bold">E</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>xample <InlineEquation ID="IEq5"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="11554_2025_1648_Article_IEq5.gif" Format="GIF" Height="14" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="19" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\textbf{M}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi mathvariant="bold">M</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>ining for Abdominal Organ Segmentation (DEvi-HEM). It is a novel dual-branch framework integrating hard example mining (HEM) at region and pixel levels. By applying higher penalty weights to hard examples, HEM improves fine-grained prediction. The dual-branch structure enhances the model’s expressiveness by learning from both region-level and pixel-level representations. Furthermore, the introduction of dual-branch consistency learning and adversarial learning-based variational distributions captures the cognitive variability across branches. This ensures precise segmentation and reliable uncertainty estimation. DEvi-HEM improves segmentation performance, cuts computational cost, and outperforms uncertainty-based methods, with 3.292 GFLOPs on FLARE22 and 2.486 GFLOPs on Synapse.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Dual-branch evidential framework fusing hard example mining for abdominal organ segmentation

  • Xiangchun Yu,
  • Tianqi Wu,
  • Dingwen Zhang,
  • Miaomiao Liang,
  • Lingjuan Yu,
  • Jian Zheng

摘要

U-Net variants commonly encounter limitations due to overconfidence in predictions, impeding their clinical applicability. Quantifying model uncertainty accurately is vital, but obtaining sufficient and reliable evidence remains challenging. This paper introduces the \(\textbf{D}\) D ual-Branch \(\textbf{Evi}\) Evi dential Framework Fusing \(\textbf{H}\) H ard \(\textbf{E}\) E xample \(\textbf{M}\) M ining for Abdominal Organ Segmentation (DEvi-HEM). It is a novel dual-branch framework integrating hard example mining (HEM) at region and pixel levels. By applying higher penalty weights to hard examples, HEM improves fine-grained prediction. The dual-branch structure enhances the model’s expressiveness by learning from both region-level and pixel-level representations. Furthermore, the introduction of dual-branch consistency learning and adversarial learning-based variational distributions captures the cognitive variability across branches. This ensures precise segmentation and reliable uncertainty estimation. DEvi-HEM improves segmentation performance, cuts computational cost, and outperforms uncertainty-based methods, with 3.292 GFLOPs on FLARE22 and 2.486 GFLOPs on Synapse.