Scholarlink

Introduction <p>The rehapro-pilot project GIBI (Ganzheitliche Klärung des Interventionsbedarfs bei gefährdeter beruflicher Integration; funding: Bundesministerium für Arbeit und Soziales) is a&#xa0;holistic approach to assess health-related work restrictions and combines rehabilitative medical and occupational health expertise. The aim of this study is to supplement data of the observational study by identifying factors that promote and hinder the implementation of the intervention or cooperation with occupational physicians.</p> Methods <p>The observational study, which is followed by the focus group study, is registered in the German Register of Clinical Studies (DRKS00024522). For data collection, three guided online focus groups were conducted with study coordinators responsible for GIBI, medical professionals, and therapeutic staff of the participating rehabilitation facilities. The data were anonymized, transcribed, and evaluated according to the principles of qualitative content analysis according to Mayring. Categories were formed inductively.</p> Results <p>Data from three focus groups with a&#xa0;total of 13&#xa0;people were considered for analysis (Aukrug: <i>n</i> = 5; Hamburg: <i>n</i> = 4; Rostock: <i>n</i> = 4). In the focus groups, the interdisciplinary approach and early availability were identified as facilitating factors, while a&#xa0;high implementation effort and a&#xa0;lack of trust in occupational physicians as well as a&#xa0;shortage of time resources were identified as hindering factors in the implementation of the intervention. The transmission of final reports to occupational physicians was also identified as a&#xa0;facilitating factor for cooperation with occupational physicians, while difficulties in establishing personal contact and the shortage of time resources of occupational physicians were identified as hindering factors for cooperation.</p> Conclusion <p>Interdisciplinary cooperation in the diagnostic process and organizational issues, such as the exchange of reports between the rehabilitation center and occupational physicians, should be guaranteed to ensure successful implementation.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Einflussfaktoren bei einer ganzheitlichen Diagnostik zur Förderung der Arbeitsfähigkeit. Eine Fokusgruppenstudie

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年2月18日

查看全文
  • Jessica Roder,
  • David Fauser,
  • Stella Lemke,
  • Saskia Dötsch,
  • Claudia Kindel,
  • Vera Kleineke,
  • Matthias Bethge

摘要

Introduction

The rehapro-pilot project GIBI (Ganzheitliche Klärung des Interventionsbedarfs bei gefährdeter beruflicher Integration; funding: Bundesministerium für Arbeit und Soziales) is a holistic approach to assess health-related work restrictions and combines rehabilitative medical and occupational health expertise. The aim of this study is to supplement data of the observational study by identifying factors that promote and hinder the implementation of the intervention or cooperation with occupational physicians.

Methods

The observational study, which is followed by the focus group study, is registered in the German Register of Clinical Studies (DRKS00024522). For data collection, three guided online focus groups were conducted with study coordinators responsible for GIBI, medical professionals, and therapeutic staff of the participating rehabilitation facilities. The data were anonymized, transcribed, and evaluated according to the principles of qualitative content analysis according to Mayring. Categories were formed inductively.

Results

Data from three focus groups with a total of 13 people were considered for analysis (Aukrug: n = 5; Hamburg: n = 4; Rostock: n = 4). In the focus groups, the interdisciplinary approach and early availability were identified as facilitating factors, while a high implementation effort and a lack of trust in occupational physicians as well as a shortage of time resources were identified as hindering factors in the implementation of the intervention. The transmission of final reports to occupational physicians was also identified as a facilitating factor for cooperation with occupational physicians, while difficulties in establishing personal contact and the shortage of time resources of occupational physicians were identified as hindering factors for cooperation.

Conclusion

Interdisciplinary cooperation in the diagnostic process and organizational issues, such as the exchange of reports between the rehabilitation center and occupational physicians, should be guaranteed to ensure successful implementation.