Purpose <p>We explore an approach to develop telemedical Graphical User Interfaces (GUIs) using User-centered Design (UCD) methods. In contrast with prior work that emphasizes system integration, we center on the GUI as the clinician’s primary interface.</p> Methods <p>In a user-centered, two-stage process, we developed a modular and generalized GUI architecture and adapted it to a Robotic Ultrasound System (RUSS) and a robotic Tension Pneumothorax (tPTX) system. The GUIs were iteratively co-designed and evaluated with physicians using mixed methods (System Usability Scale (SUS), end-user-adapted heuristics, eye-tracking).</p> Results <p>The results of the study confirm the benefits of UCD methods for the development of GUIs for telemedical robotic systems. Repeated exposure increased efficiency across tasks and scenarios, indicating the usability (training effect) and consistency (cross-scenario learning transfer) of a modular GUI architecture. The mixed-methods design provided complementary insights via triangulation, helped to analyze outliers, and revealed additional design issues not captured by one method alone.</p> Conclusion <p>A user-centered GUI development process with multiple evaluation rounds can improve the usability of telemedical robotic systems for medical professionals. Our findings show that a modular architecture can facilitate the transfer of training effects across implementations and clinical use cases by preserving high-level structures and interaction concepts.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

User-centered design of graphical user interfaces for telemedical robotic systems: development and usability study

  • Sven Kolb,
  • Marie Kautt,
  • Lars Wagner,
  • Simon Saurbier,
  • Sven Matthiesen,
  • Dirk Wilhelm,
  • Carolin Müller

摘要

Purpose

We explore an approach to develop telemedical Graphical User Interfaces (GUIs) using User-centered Design (UCD) methods. In contrast with prior work that emphasizes system integration, we center on the GUI as the clinician’s primary interface.

Methods

In a user-centered, two-stage process, we developed a modular and generalized GUI architecture and adapted it to a Robotic Ultrasound System (RUSS) and a robotic Tension Pneumothorax (tPTX) system. The GUIs were iteratively co-designed and evaluated with physicians using mixed methods (System Usability Scale (SUS), end-user-adapted heuristics, eye-tracking).

Results

The results of the study confirm the benefits of UCD methods for the development of GUIs for telemedical robotic systems. Repeated exposure increased efficiency across tasks and scenarios, indicating the usability (training effect) and consistency (cross-scenario learning transfer) of a modular GUI architecture. The mixed-methods design provided complementary insights via triangulation, helped to analyze outliers, and revealed additional design issues not captured by one method alone.

Conclusion

A user-centered GUI development process with multiple evaluation rounds can improve the usability of telemedical robotic systems for medical professionals. Our findings show that a modular architecture can facilitate the transfer of training effects across implementations and clinical use cases by preserving high-level structures and interaction concepts.