Scholarlink

<p>This study examined dynamic decision-making processes at three different levels in the field of instructional design (ID): (a) for managers of instructional designers (IDers) at the institutional level, (b) for Senior IDers at the program level, and (c) for IDers at the course level. This qualitative study utilized collaborative autoethnography (CAE) to address a gap in the literature by explaining ID decision-making processes provided by three professionals at three different levels: institutional, program, and course. This study followed the framework for the dynamic decision-making process by Stefaniak et al. (2022) to examine how each level approaches: (a) conjecture within bounded rationality, (b) exploring through analogical reasoning, and (c) design-in-action. The researchers identified three themes through thematic analysis in their reflections: bounded rationality across three levels, strategies for analogical reasoning across three levels, and design-in-action strategies across three levels.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Dynamic Instructional Design Decision-Making: Three-Level Approach

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年7月23日

查看全文
  • Belen Garcia de Hurtado,
  • Larisa Olesova,
  • Constance Harris

摘要

This study examined dynamic decision-making processes at three different levels in the field of instructional design (ID): (a) for managers of instructional designers (IDers) at the institutional level, (b) for Senior IDers at the program level, and (c) for IDers at the course level. This qualitative study utilized collaborative autoethnography (CAE) to address a gap in the literature by explaining ID decision-making processes provided by three professionals at three different levels: institutional, program, and course. This study followed the framework for the dynamic decision-making process by Stefaniak et al. (2022) to examine how each level approaches: (a) conjecture within bounded rationality, (b) exploring through analogical reasoning, and (c) design-in-action. The researchers identified three themes through thematic analysis in their reflections: bounded rationality across three levels, strategies for analogical reasoning across three levels, and design-in-action strategies across three levels.