<p>In extended black hole thermodynamics, the cosmological constant and other couplings are treated as thermodynamic variables, yielding the first law <InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\tilde{\delta}M=T\tilde{\delta}S+\Omega\tilde{\delta} J+{\cal{V}}\tilde{\delta}P+\ldots\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math display="block"> <mrow> <mover> <mi>δ</mi> <mo stretchy="false">~</mo> </mover> </mrow> <mi>M</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mi>T</mi> <mrow> <mover> <mi>δ</mi> <mo stretchy="false">~</mo> </mover> </mrow> <mi>S</mi> <mo>+</mo> <mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mi> <mrow> <mover> <mi>δ</mi> <mo stretchy="false">~</mo> </mover> </mrow> <mi>J</mi> <mo>+</mo> <mrow> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="script">V</mi> </mrow> </mrow> <mrow> <mover> <mi>δ</mi> <mo stretchy="false">~</mo> </mover> </mrow> <mi>P</mi> <mo>+</mo> <mo>…</mo> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, where <InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(P\equiv - \ {\Lambda\over 8 \pi}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math display="block"> <mi>P</mi> <mo>≡</mo> <mo>−</mo> <mrow> <mfrac> <mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</mi> <mrow> <mn>8</mn> <mi>π</mi> </mrow> </mfrac> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. A long-standing conceptual gap in this framework is that, unlike <i>M, T, S</i>, Ω, and <i>J</i>, the thermodynamic volume <InlineEquation ID="IEq3"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\cal{V}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math display="block"> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="script">V</mi> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> lacks a first-principles definition and can only be deduced from other thermodynamic quantities. This deficiency indicates that the underlying origin of <InlineEquation ID="IEq4"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\cal{V}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math display="block"> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="script">V</mi> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> remains poorly understood. In this paper, we resolve this issue and provide an explicit, covariant formula for <InlineEquation ID="IEq5"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\cal{V}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math display="block"> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="script">V</mi> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. We demonstrate that <InlineEquation ID="IEq6"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\cal{V}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math display="block"> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="script">V</mi> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> (and the conjugate quantities of other couplings) universally decomposes into two contributions: one arising from the explicit coupling dependence of the Lagrangian, and the other from the response of the fundamental dynamical fields. This clarifies the physical meaning of the thermodynamic volume and places it on the same footing as other intrinsic thermodynamic quantities.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Explicit and covariant formula for thermodynamic volume in extended black hole thermodynamics

  • Yong Xiao,
  • Yu-Xiao Liu,
  • Yu Tian,
  • Hongbao Zhang

摘要

In extended black hole thermodynamics, the cosmological constant and other couplings are treated as thermodynamic variables, yielding the first law \(\tilde{\delta}M=T\tilde{\delta}S+\Omega\tilde{\delta} J+{\cal{V}}\tilde{\delta}P+\ldots\) δ ~ M = T δ ~ S + Ω δ ~ J + V δ ~ P + , where \(P\equiv - \ {\Lambda\over 8 \pi}\) P Λ 8 π . A long-standing conceptual gap in this framework is that, unlike M, T, S, Ω, and J, the thermodynamic volume \(\cal{V}\) V lacks a first-principles definition and can only be deduced from other thermodynamic quantities. This deficiency indicates that the underlying origin of \(\cal{V}\) V remains poorly understood. In this paper, we resolve this issue and provide an explicit, covariant formula for \(\cal{V}\) V . We demonstrate that \(\cal{V}\) V (and the conjugate quantities of other couplings) universally decomposes into two contributions: one arising from the explicit coupling dependence of the Lagrangian, and the other from the response of the fundamental dynamical fields. This clarifies the physical meaning of the thermodynamic volume and places it on the same footing as other intrinsic thermodynamic quantities.