<p>One of the research hotspots in geotechnical engineering is the solidification of problematic soil foundations. However, the traditional materials, such as Portland cement, lime, and various types of chemical solutions, typically cause CO₂ emissions and environmental pollution. Geopolymer is a newly proposed method for soil solidification, offering an environmentally friendly and effective solution. Given that soils typically consist of diverse compositions, an optimal soil stabilization technique should be versatile enough to be applied across various soil types, ensuring consistent strength outcomes with minimal variations among different soil compositions. In this study, three commonly used geopolymers (fly ash, ground granulated blast-furnace slag, and metakaolin) were utilized to stabilize silt, loess, silica sand, calcareous sand, and gravel, representing a diverse range of soils. The mechanical properties and microstructures of both geopolymers and geopolymer-stabilized soils were analyzed. The findings indicated that the strength of stabilized coarse cohesionless soils was primarily influenced by the mechanical properties of the geopolymers themselves, with minimal impact from the inherent properties of the soil. However, the effectiveness of stabilizing cohesive soil may show significant discrepancies compared to the mechanical properties of geopolymer materials when certain types of geopolymers, like metakaolin, are employed. Higher strength is typically achieved through a denser structure (with fewer pores) and the presence of products with a higher degree of polymerization. Additionally, ground granulated blast-furnace slag exhibited excellent stability and superior strength when compared to other types of geopolymers. The present research establishes a basis for selecting geopolymers to stabilize a range of soils, including those with non-uniform compositions and diverse components.</p>