Scholarlink

<p>The current systematic review study explores instructional designer practices to develop a comprehensive understanding of strategies employed by instructional designers and the expectations of the field. Using the PRISMA protocol, a total of 98 articles were included in the review consisting of 65 qualitative, 15 quantitative, and 18 mixed-methods studies. Instructional designer practices were analyzed through the lens of 10 different topical areas: (1) Attitudes and perceptions, (2) decision-making and design judgments, (3) design strategies, (4) professional development and professional identity, (5) design heuristics, (6) instructional designer and faculty relationships, (7) instructional design competencies, (8) problem-solving, (9) instructional design teams, (9) instructional design teams, (10) change management and organizational development. Evidence-based recommendations and suggestions for practices of current and future instructional designers were discussed.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

A comprehensive review of instructional designer research and approaches in learning design

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2025年4月23日

查看全文
  • Jill E. Stefaniak,
  • Eunkyoung Elaine Cha,
  • Fan Yang,
  • Stephanie Gilstrap,
  • Liangke Yang

摘要

The current systematic review study explores instructional designer practices to develop a comprehensive understanding of strategies employed by instructional designers and the expectations of the field. Using the PRISMA protocol, a total of 98 articles were included in the review consisting of 65 qualitative, 15 quantitative, and 18 mixed-methods studies. Instructional designer practices were analyzed through the lens of 10 different topical areas: (1) Attitudes and perceptions, (2) decision-making and design judgments, (3) design strategies, (4) professional development and professional identity, (5) design heuristics, (6) instructional designer and faculty relationships, (7) instructional design competencies, (8) problem-solving, (9) instructional design teams, (9) instructional design teams, (10) change management and organizational development. Evidence-based recommendations and suggestions for practices of current and future instructional designers were discussed.