Scholarlink

<p>In this paper, I attempt to uncover motivations for the main premise that supports essential representationalism about perceptual experience (ER), namely the <i>Immediacy thesis</i>. ER claims that for every phenomenal property in the class Φ, there is some representational property R such that, necessarily, having Φ entails having R. The <i>Immediacy thesis</i> is that, roughly, the very phenomenal relation to the experience’s qualitative profile entails a representational relation to the qualitative profile of the represented object, and that these two profiles are type-identical. In §&#xa0;2, I clarify ER’s commitments. Then I attempt to uncover the role of the <i>Immediacy thesis</i> in the four arguments for representationalism: the argument from transparency (§&#xa0;3), the argument from inference to the best explanation (§&#xa0;4), the argument from perceptual seemings (§&#xa0;5), and the argument from perceptual capacities (§&#xa0;6). In §&#xa0;7, I conclude by wrapping up the results of my analyses in §§&#xa0;3–6 and elaborating on the role of the so-called <i>Immediacy thesis</i> in the dialectic of representationalist arguments.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Immediacy and the Representational Character of Perceptual Experience

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年6月23日

查看全文
  • Paweł Grad

摘要

In this paper, I attempt to uncover motivations for the main premise that supports essential representationalism about perceptual experience (ER), namely the Immediacy thesis. ER claims that for every phenomenal property in the class Φ, there is some representational property R such that, necessarily, having Φ entails having R. The Immediacy thesis is that, roughly, the very phenomenal relation to the experience’s qualitative profile entails a representational relation to the qualitative profile of the represented object, and that these two profiles are type-identical. In § 2, I clarify ER’s commitments. Then I attempt to uncover the role of the Immediacy thesis in the four arguments for representationalism: the argument from transparency (§ 3), the argument from inference to the best explanation (§ 4), the argument from perceptual seemings (§ 5), and the argument from perceptual capacities (§ 6). In § 7, I conclude by wrapping up the results of my analyses in §§ 3–6 and elaborating on the role of the so-called Immediacy thesis in the dialectic of representationalist arguments.