<p>This article presents Hume’s insights into the mechanics of social comparison. It attends to the overlooked role of comparison in Hume’s theory of cognition and its bearing on his moral psychology of social comparison. This article identifies three main meanings of comparison in Hume: (a) the comparative principle of reasoning, b) acts of comparison, and c) a comparative disposition. It also identifies four modes of comparative valuation:&#xa0;(1) intrinsic valuation, (2) experiential valuation, (3) subjective social valuation, and (4) objective social valuation. This provided taxonomy of comparison across Hume’s theory of cognition helps us better understand the moral psychology of social comparison by grounding it in his theory of cognition. Consequently, this article challenges the view that comparison plays a secondary role to sympathy in Hume and corrects scholarly positions on social comparison’s primary dependency on the principles of context, contrast, and “reversal-comparison.”</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Social Comparison in Hume: Theory of Cognition and Moral Psychology

  • Wojciech Kaftanski

摘要

This article presents Hume’s insights into the mechanics of social comparison. It attends to the overlooked role of comparison in Hume’s theory of cognition and its bearing on his moral psychology of social comparison. This article identifies three main meanings of comparison in Hume: (a) the comparative principle of reasoning, b) acts of comparison, and c) a comparative disposition. It also identifies four modes of comparative valuation: (1) intrinsic valuation, (2) experiential valuation, (3) subjective social valuation, and (4) objective social valuation. This provided taxonomy of comparison across Hume’s theory of cognition helps us better understand the moral psychology of social comparison by grounding it in his theory of cognition. Consequently, this article challenges the view that comparison plays a secondary role to sympathy in Hume and corrects scholarly positions on social comparison’s primary dependency on the principles of context, contrast, and “reversal-comparison.”