Scholarlink

<p>This essay offers replies to the commentaries on my recent book, <i>Free Will’s Value: Criminal Justice</i>,<i> Pride</i>,<i> and Love</i> (Lemos, <CitationRef CitationID="CR13">2023</CitationRef>). Issues addressed concern the coherence of my indeterministic weightings view of libertarian free will, the empirical plausibility of the view, the rational basis for my rejection of compatibilism, and the merits of my pragmatic/axiological defense of belief in such free will.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Replies To Caruso, Elzein, Pereboom, Sekatskaya, and Smilansky

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2025年7月1日

查看全文
  • John Lemos

摘要

This essay offers replies to the commentaries on my recent book, Free Will’s Value: Criminal Justice, Pride, and Love (Lemos, 2023). Issues addressed concern the coherence of my indeterministic weightings view of libertarian free will, the empirical plausibility of the view, the rational basis for my rejection of compatibilism, and the merits of my pragmatic/axiological defense of belief in such free will.