Purpose <p>Anthropogenic activities such as land use change (LUC) greatly regulate greenhouse gas emissions (GHGs). However, the effects of LUC on GHGs are rarely comprehensively evaluated in China.</p> Materials and methods <p>Here, a meta-analysis was conducted to estimate the responses of CO<sub>2</sub> emissions, CH<sub>4</sub> uptakes, and N<sub>2</sub>O emissions to LUCs under climate factors and soil conditions.</p> Results and discussion <p>Cropland and grassland released more CO<sub>2</sub> than bare land due to enhanced microbial decomposition and root respiration. Grasslands exceeded cropland by 29% in CO<sub>2</sub> emissions from greater root biomass, while coniferous forests surpassed cropland by 30% due to higher underground biomass and litter accumulation. Cropland showed 48% lower CH<sub>4</sub> uptake than forests, linked to suppressed methane oxidation from nitrogen fertilization and tillage. Converting plantations to cropland reduced CH₄ uptake by 36%, likely due to diminished soil organic carbon (SOC) availability for methanotrophs. With improved soil aeration and nitrifying archaea activity, forests exhibited 82% and 38% lower N₂O emissions than cropland and wetlands.</p> Conclusion <p>Land use change greatly affected GHGs. More GHGs were produced from cropland likely due to soil disturbance induced by various management practices, i.e., tillage, fertilization, etc. In contrast, forest was recommended as a favored land use type for reducing CO<sub>2</sub>, CH<sub>4</sub> and N<sub>2</sub>O simultaneously. This study will provide insights into the implementation of climate change mitigation strategies in China.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

How land use change affects greenhouse gas emission in China

  • Zixuan Chen,
  • Shuang Fu,
  • Di Sun,
  • Ming Yang

摘要

Purpose

Anthropogenic activities such as land use change (LUC) greatly regulate greenhouse gas emissions (GHGs). However, the effects of LUC on GHGs are rarely comprehensively evaluated in China.

Materials and methods

Here, a meta-analysis was conducted to estimate the responses of CO2 emissions, CH4 uptakes, and N2O emissions to LUCs under climate factors and soil conditions.

Results and discussion

Cropland and grassland released more CO2 than bare land due to enhanced microbial decomposition and root respiration. Grasslands exceeded cropland by 29% in CO2 emissions from greater root biomass, while coniferous forests surpassed cropland by 30% due to higher underground biomass and litter accumulation. Cropland showed 48% lower CH4 uptake than forests, linked to suppressed methane oxidation from nitrogen fertilization and tillage. Converting plantations to cropland reduced CH₄ uptake by 36%, likely due to diminished soil organic carbon (SOC) availability for methanotrophs. With improved soil aeration and nitrifying archaea activity, forests exhibited 82% and 38% lower N₂O emissions than cropland and wetlands.

Conclusion

Land use change greatly affected GHGs. More GHGs were produced from cropland likely due to soil disturbance induced by various management practices, i.e., tillage, fertilization, etc. In contrast, forest was recommended as a favored land use type for reducing CO2, CH4 and N2O simultaneously. This study will provide insights into the implementation of climate change mitigation strategies in China.