Purpose <p>Increased left atrial (LA) stiffness has been associated with atrial arrhythmias in athletes; however, data regarding the LA stiffness index in sprint athletes are limited. This study aimed to evaluate left atrial stiffness and mechanical function in competitive sprinters.</p> Methods <p>Fifty elite sprinters and thirty-five age- and sex-matched healthy sedentary controls were included. Conventional echocardiography and two-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography were performed. LA reservoir strain (PALS), contraction strain (PACS), and LA stiffness index (E/e′/PALS) were calculated.</p> Results <p>There were no significant differences between sprinters and controls in LA volume index (20.92 ± 5.66 vs 19.30 ± 4.29&#xa0;mL/m<sup>2</sup>, <i>p</i> = 0.159), LA global PALS (40.01 ± 7.74% vs 41.67 ± 8.04%, <i>p</i> = 0.343), LA global PACS (13.63 ± 4.42% vs 15.22 ± 4.40%, <i>p</i> = 0.106), or LA stiffness index (0.14 ± 0.03 vs 0.15 ± 0.04, <i>p</i> = 0.147). LV filling pressures assessed by E/e′ ratio were also similar between groups (<i>p</i> = 0.380).</p> Conclusion <p>Long-term sprint training does not appear to affect LA stiffness or mechanical function adversely.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Left atrial stiffness index in sprinters

  • Esra Poyraz,
  • Fatma Can

摘要

Purpose

Increased left atrial (LA) stiffness has been associated with atrial arrhythmias in athletes; however, data regarding the LA stiffness index in sprint athletes are limited. This study aimed to evaluate left atrial stiffness and mechanical function in competitive sprinters.

Methods

Fifty elite sprinters and thirty-five age- and sex-matched healthy sedentary controls were included. Conventional echocardiography and two-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography were performed. LA reservoir strain (PALS), contraction strain (PACS), and LA stiffness index (E/e′/PALS) were calculated.

Results

There were no significant differences between sprinters and controls in LA volume index (20.92 ± 5.66 vs 19.30 ± 4.29 mL/m2, p = 0.159), LA global PALS (40.01 ± 7.74% vs 41.67 ± 8.04%, p = 0.343), LA global PACS (13.63 ± 4.42% vs 15.22 ± 4.40%, p = 0.106), or LA stiffness index (0.14 ± 0.03 vs 0.15 ± 0.04, p = 0.147). LV filling pressures assessed by E/e′ ratio were also similar between groups (p = 0.380).

Conclusion

Long-term sprint training does not appear to affect LA stiffness or mechanical function adversely.