Purpose <p>An appropriate interface is essential for the success of home mechanical ventilation (HMV). The objective of the study was to describe the interfaces used in a large cohort of children.</p> Methods <p>The underlying disorder, model of interface, age, weight, and head circumference (for children &lt; 3 years old) at HMV initiation, were gathered. The patients were divided by categories of age and disorder (children &lt; 3 years old).</p> Results <p>The data were available for 476 interfaces from 380 patients. Mean age was 6.4 ± 5.9 (range 0.02–23.1) years old. The most common interface was the pediatric Soft baby XS nasal interface (Air Liquide; <i>n</i> = 100). The second most used interface was the adult Wisp nasal interface (Philips Respironics, <i>n</i> = 69). The interface used at the youngest age was the Soft baby XXS nasal interface (mean age 0.2 ± 0.2 years old). For children &lt; 1 year old, 2 different interfaces were used with different sizes of headgear and/or cushion. From 3 years old, a larger range of interfaces was used, and from 12 years old, only 3/108 (3%) patients used a pediatric interface. The patient with the minimal head circumference had Robin sequence, and the one with the maximal head circumference had a faciostenosis.</p> Conclusion <p>As expected, the most used interface was a pediatric nasal mask, but interestingly an adult nasal mask was the second most used interface. The choice is still limited in young children. A larger range of interfaces, especially for young children, and custom-made interfaces for selected patients, may facilitate the implementation of HMV worldwide.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

CPAP/NIV interfaces for children according to age

  • Marine Dosso,
  • Lucie Griffon,
  • Meryl Vedrenne-Cloquet,
  • Clément Poirault,
  • Brigitte Fauroux,
  • Sonia Khirani

摘要

Purpose

An appropriate interface is essential for the success of home mechanical ventilation (HMV). The objective of the study was to describe the interfaces used in a large cohort of children.

Methods

The underlying disorder, model of interface, age, weight, and head circumference (for children < 3 years old) at HMV initiation, were gathered. The patients were divided by categories of age and disorder (children < 3 years old).

Results

The data were available for 476 interfaces from 380 patients. Mean age was 6.4 ± 5.9 (range 0.02–23.1) years old. The most common interface was the pediatric Soft baby XS nasal interface (Air Liquide; n = 100). The second most used interface was the adult Wisp nasal interface (Philips Respironics, n = 69). The interface used at the youngest age was the Soft baby XXS nasal interface (mean age 0.2 ± 0.2 years old). For children < 1 year old, 2 different interfaces were used with different sizes of headgear and/or cushion. From 3 years old, a larger range of interfaces was used, and from 12 years old, only 3/108 (3%) patients used a pediatric interface. The patient with the minimal head circumference had Robin sequence, and the one with the maximal head circumference had a faciostenosis.

Conclusion

As expected, the most used interface was a pediatric nasal mask, but interestingly an adult nasal mask was the second most used interface. The choice is still limited in young children. A larger range of interfaces, especially for young children, and custom-made interfaces for selected patients, may facilitate the implementation of HMV worldwide.