Scholarlink

<p>Research on algorithmic management is expanding rapidly but remains highly fragmented, lacking a systematized understanding of how cross-disciplinary debates address its real-world implementation barriers. To address this gap, this study conducts a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of 340 peer-reviewed journal articles (2015–2025), explicitly adopting a blended review approach that integrates phenomenon- and field-focused strands. Moving beyond descriptive science mapping, we elevate thematic trajectories into causal narratives, demonstrating how the academic discourse has fundamentally matured from isolated technical inquiry into a systemic socio-ethical critique driven by macro-forces such as generative AI and modern labor regulations. By unpacking the field’s most influential literature, we conceptualize the status quo across four core socio-technical tensions: coordination efficiency versus psychological well-being, algorithmic control versus worker resistance, algorithmic opacity versus structural governance, and the transition from platform labor to mainstream corporate human resource management. Based on this synthesis, we propose an actionable, multi-stakeholder future research agenda and outline practical governance interventions, offering an essential roadmap for researchers, practitioners, and policymakers navigating the algorithmic workplace.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Artificial intelligence as manager: confronting implementation barriers and shaping future research

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年7月25日

查看全文
  • Arne Jeppe,
  • Tim Bree,
  • Erik Karger,
  • Frederik Ahlemann,
  • Heike Proff

摘要

Research on algorithmic management is expanding rapidly but remains highly fragmented, lacking a systematized understanding of how cross-disciplinary debates address its real-world implementation barriers. To address this gap, this study conducts a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of 340 peer-reviewed journal articles (2015–2025), explicitly adopting a blended review approach that integrates phenomenon- and field-focused strands. Moving beyond descriptive science mapping, we elevate thematic trajectories into causal narratives, demonstrating how the academic discourse has fundamentally matured from isolated technical inquiry into a systemic socio-ethical critique driven by macro-forces such as generative AI and modern labor regulations. By unpacking the field’s most influential literature, we conceptualize the status quo across four core socio-technical tensions: coordination efficiency versus psychological well-being, algorithmic control versus worker resistance, algorithmic opacity versus structural governance, and the transition from platform labor to mainstream corporate human resource management. Based on this synthesis, we propose an actionable, multi-stakeholder future research agenda and outline practical governance interventions, offering an essential roadmap for researchers, practitioners, and policymakers navigating the algorithmic workplace.