Scholarlink

Objectives <p>Zirconia oral implants produce larger artifacts on computed tomography (CT) compared to titanium oral implants. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of metal artifact reduction (MAR) software and dual-energy (DE) methods, which are used in multi-detector CT (MDCT) to reduce the artifacts produced by titanium and zirconia oral implants.</p> Methods <p>Oral implants were placed in the lower right second premolar and second molar regions of an acrylic mandible model and evaluated using MDCT. For MAR, Single Energy Metal Artifact Reaction (SEMAR) images were obtained, and for DE, images were obtained at 135&#xa0;keV. The evaluation was based on 21 regions of interest (ROIs) with sides of 2.8&#xa0;mm, set at 15, 25, and 35&#xa0;mm from the center (the lower-right first premolar), with 65°, 90°, 115°, and 145° angles set on the buccal and lingual sides. The evaluation was based on an Artifact Index (AI).</p> Results <p>The lingual aspect of the AI tended to be larger compared to the buccal aspect, regardless of the image-processing method. In addition, the SEMAR method tended to have a greater artifact reduction effect than the DE method. The distortion of the mandibular model and occurrence of new artifacts were confirmed using SEMAR.</p> Conclusions <p>SEMAR had higher artifact reduction effects on metal artifacts than the DE method. Although SEMAR and dual-energy methods can effectively reduce metal artifacts, they also cause false images and areas that cannot be observed. Therefore, diagnostic and treatment planning, including imaging, is essential before artifact reduction processing.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Evaluation of the effect of reducing metal artifacts in multi-detector CT imaging of zirconia and titanium implants

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2025年3月4日

查看全文
  • Hideki Suito,
  • Hozumi Yoshihara,
  • Naoki Maeda,
  • Ryosuke Kasai,
  • Tadashi Inoue,
  • Masafumi Amano,
  • Yuuri Oku,
  • Keiko Fujimoto,
  • Kan Nagao

摘要

Objectives

Zirconia oral implants produce larger artifacts on computed tomography (CT) compared to titanium oral implants. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of metal artifact reduction (MAR) software and dual-energy (DE) methods, which are used in multi-detector CT (MDCT) to reduce the artifacts produced by titanium and zirconia oral implants.

Methods

Oral implants were placed in the lower right second premolar and second molar regions of an acrylic mandible model and evaluated using MDCT. For MAR, Single Energy Metal Artifact Reaction (SEMAR) images were obtained, and for DE, images were obtained at 135 keV. The evaluation was based on 21 regions of interest (ROIs) with sides of 2.8 mm, set at 15, 25, and 35 mm from the center (the lower-right first premolar), with 65°, 90°, 115°, and 145° angles set on the buccal and lingual sides. The evaluation was based on an Artifact Index (AI).

Results

The lingual aspect of the AI tended to be larger compared to the buccal aspect, regardless of the image-processing method. In addition, the SEMAR method tended to have a greater artifact reduction effect than the DE method. The distortion of the mandibular model and occurrence of new artifacts were confirmed using SEMAR.

Conclusions

SEMAR had higher artifact reduction effects on metal artifacts than the DE method. Although SEMAR and dual-energy methods can effectively reduce metal artifacts, they also cause false images and areas that cannot be observed. Therefore, diagnostic and treatment planning, including imaging, is essential before artifact reduction processing.