Scholarlink

<p>Bovine tuberculosis (bTB), caused by <i>Mycobacterium bovis</i> (<i>M. bovis</i>), remains a major zoonotic and economically burdensome disease worldwide. In Tunisia, where bTB has remained present for many years, Efforts to eliminate the disease have been slowed down by limited diagnostic tools and a lack of resources. The tuberculin Intra Dermal Reaction test (IDR), also known as Tuberculin Skin Test (TST), is still the main tool for surveillance, but its low sensitivity and specificity show the need for better diagnostic methods. This study evaluated the diagnostic performance of IDR, PCR<sub>Mpb70</sub> and three serological rapid tests: Quickvet Ab<sup>®</sup> (Ac1, detecting antibodies against a recombinant <i>M.bovis</i> antigen), Vetdiagnostix Ab<sup>®</sup> (Ac2, detecting antibodies against a recombinant MPB70/MPB83 fusion protein), and Vetdiagnostix Ag<sup>®</sup> (Monoclonal antibodies against Bovine IFN-γ detecting a native <i>M. bovis</i> antigen complex) in Tunisian cattle (<i>n</i> = 32). Based on AI, Bayesian Latent Class Model (BLCM) analysis, PCR<sub>Mpb70</sub> was identified as the most reliable reference standard due to its high sensitivity (Se) and perfect specificity (Sp) when assessed alongside other tests. Using PCR<sub>Mpb70</sub> as a proxy gold standard, supervised machine learning via the Random Forest algorithm was employed to assess the predictive performance of the individual and combined diagnostic tests. As a main result, a high bTB prevalence (46.37%) was confirmed in the tested animals, although prevalence estimates varied considerably depending on the diagnostic test used (average ± 9.76). The combinations IDR2/Ac2, IDR2/Ag, and IDR2/Ac2/Ag pair a second IntraDermal test (IDR2) with antibody tests for Ac2, Ag, or both, proved to be the most informative and complementary alternatives to PCR. These approaches provide practical and effective diagnostic options for field settings where access to molecular testing is limited or unavailable.</p> Graphical abstract <p></p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Field-oriented assessment of bovine tuberculosis in Tunisian cattle: IDR, PCRMpb70 and serological test prediction based on AI approaches

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2025年9月26日

查看全文
  • Said Jaajaa,
  • Wafa Bouglita,
  • Oussema Khamessi,
  • Ghada Mahjoub,
  • Sana Dhaouadi,
  • Ahmed Rjeb,
  • Kais Ghedira,
  • Hanen Smadhi,
  • Ramzi Boubaker Elandoulsi

摘要

Bovine tuberculosis (bTB), caused by Mycobacterium bovis (M. bovis), remains a major zoonotic and economically burdensome disease worldwide. In Tunisia, where bTB has remained present for many years, Efforts to eliminate the disease have been slowed down by limited diagnostic tools and a lack of resources. The tuberculin Intra Dermal Reaction test (IDR), also known as Tuberculin Skin Test (TST), is still the main tool for surveillance, but its low sensitivity and specificity show the need for better diagnostic methods. This study evaluated the diagnostic performance of IDR, PCRMpb70 and three serological rapid tests: Quickvet Ab® (Ac1, detecting antibodies against a recombinant M.bovis antigen), Vetdiagnostix Ab® (Ac2, detecting antibodies against a recombinant MPB70/MPB83 fusion protein), and Vetdiagnostix Ag® (Monoclonal antibodies against Bovine IFN-γ detecting a native M. bovis antigen complex) in Tunisian cattle (n = 32). Based on AI, Bayesian Latent Class Model (BLCM) analysis, PCRMpb70 was identified as the most reliable reference standard due to its high sensitivity (Se) and perfect specificity (Sp) when assessed alongside other tests. Using PCRMpb70 as a proxy gold standard, supervised machine learning via the Random Forest algorithm was employed to assess the predictive performance of the individual and combined diagnostic tests. As a main result, a high bTB prevalence (46.37%) was confirmed in the tested animals, although prevalence estimates varied considerably depending on the diagnostic test used (average ± 9.76). The combinations IDR2/Ac2, IDR2/Ag, and IDR2/Ac2/Ag pair a second IntraDermal test (IDR2) with antibody tests for Ac2, Ag, or both, proved to be the most informative and complementary alternatives to PCR. These approaches provide practical and effective diagnostic options for field settings where access to molecular testing is limited or unavailable.

Graphical abstract