<p>Microbial fuel cell (MFC) is a technology which uses microorganisms as catalyst to generate electricity from waste. However, one of the limitations of this technology is its low power output resulting due to phenomena such as methanogenesis. Pharmaceutical industries release wastewater containing pharmaceutically active compounds which affects the microbial community of the inoculum. Hence, a comparative study has been conducted to identify the most suitable suppression technique to be used during treatment of pharmaceutical wastewater in MFC. In the study, suppression techniques such as aeration (MFC<sub>Ae</sub>), ultrasonication (MFC<sub>U</sub>), aluminium dosing (MFC<sub>Al</sub>), nitrate dosing (MFC<sub>N</sub>) and chloroform dosing (MFC<sub>Cl</sub>) were compared to control (MFC<sub>C</sub>) while treating synthetic pharmaceutical wastewater. The highest open circuit voltage (OCV) was generated by MFC<sub>Cl</sub> (712&#xa0;mV), followed by MFC<sub>N</sub> (678&#xa0;mV), MFC<sub>Ae</sub> (668&#xa0;mV), MFC<sub>Al</sub> (659&#xa0;mV), MFC<sub>U</sub> (654&#xa0;mV) and MFC<sub>C</sub> (647&#xa0;mV). The COD removal efficiency was found to be highest in MFC<sub>C</sub> (93.5%) followed by MFC<sub>Ae</sub> (91.9%), MFC<sub>Al</sub> (88.9%), MFC<sub>U</sub> (88.7%), MFC<sub>N</sub> (88.5%) and MFC<sub>Cl</sub> (77%). The highest OCV generation, least chemical oxygen demand removal efficiency, highest power generation during polarization and highest coulombic efficiency observed in MFC<sub>Cl</sub> confirms its efficacy to be comparatively better than that of other conventional methanogenesis suppression techniques.</p> Graphical Abstract <p></p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Methanogenesis Suppression During Pharmaceutical Wastewater Treatment in Ceramic Separator Microbial Fuel Cell

  • Somdipta Bagchi,
  • Manaswini Behera

摘要

Microbial fuel cell (MFC) is a technology which uses microorganisms as catalyst to generate electricity from waste. However, one of the limitations of this technology is its low power output resulting due to phenomena such as methanogenesis. Pharmaceutical industries release wastewater containing pharmaceutically active compounds which affects the microbial community of the inoculum. Hence, a comparative study has been conducted to identify the most suitable suppression technique to be used during treatment of pharmaceutical wastewater in MFC. In the study, suppression techniques such as aeration (MFCAe), ultrasonication (MFCU), aluminium dosing (MFCAl), nitrate dosing (MFCN) and chloroform dosing (MFCCl) were compared to control (MFCC) while treating synthetic pharmaceutical wastewater. The highest open circuit voltage (OCV) was generated by MFCCl (712 mV), followed by MFCN (678 mV), MFCAe (668 mV), MFCAl (659 mV), MFCU (654 mV) and MFCC (647 mV). The COD removal efficiency was found to be highest in MFCC (93.5%) followed by MFCAe (91.9%), MFCAl (88.9%), MFCU (88.7%), MFCN (88.5%) and MFCCl (77%). The highest OCV generation, least chemical oxygen demand removal efficiency, highest power generation during polarization and highest coulombic efficiency observed in MFCCl confirms its efficacy to be comparatively better than that of other conventional methanogenesis suppression techniques.

Graphical Abstract