<p>Action Quality Assessment (AQA)—the ability to quantify the quality of human motion, actions, or skill levels and provide feedback—has far-reaching implications in areas such as low-cost physiotherapy, sports training, and workforce development. As such, it has become a critical field in computer vision and video understanding over the past decade. Significant progress has been made in AQA methodologies, datasets, and applications, yet a pressing need remains for a comprehensive synthesis of this rapidly evolving field. In this paper, we present a thorough survey of the AQA landscape, systematically reviewing over 200 research papers using the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) framework. We begin by covering foundational concepts and definitions, then move to general frameworks and performance metrics, and finally discuss the latest advances in methodologies and datasets. This survey provides a detailed analysis of research trends, performance comparisons, challenges, and future directions. Through this work, we aim to offer a valuable resource for both newcomers and experienced researchers, promoting further exploration and progress in AQA.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

A Decade of Action Quality Assessment: Largest Systematic Survey of Trends, Challenges, and Future Directions

  • Hao Yin,
  • Paritosh Parmar,
  • Daoliang Xu,
  • Yang Zhang,
  • Tianyou Zheng,
  • Weiwei Fu

摘要

Action Quality Assessment (AQA)—the ability to quantify the quality of human motion, actions, or skill levels and provide feedback—has far-reaching implications in areas such as low-cost physiotherapy, sports training, and workforce development. As such, it has become a critical field in computer vision and video understanding over the past decade. Significant progress has been made in AQA methodologies, datasets, and applications, yet a pressing need remains for a comprehensive synthesis of this rapidly evolving field. In this paper, we present a thorough survey of the AQA landscape, systematically reviewing over 200 research papers using the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) framework. We begin by covering foundational concepts and definitions, then move to general frameworks and performance metrics, and finally discuss the latest advances in methodologies and datasets. This survey provides a detailed analysis of research trends, performance comparisons, challenges, and future directions. Through this work, we aim to offer a valuable resource for both newcomers and experienced researchers, promoting further exploration and progress in AQA.