<p>Scene graph generation aims to detect visual relationship triplets, (subject, predicate, object). Due to biases in data, current models tend to predict common predicates, <i>e</i>.<i>g</i>., “on” and “at”, instead of informative ones, <i>e</i>.<i>g</i>., “standing on” and “looking at”. This tendency results in the loss of precise information and overall performance. If a model only uses “stone on road” rather than “stone blocking road” to describe an image, it may be a grave misunderstanding. We argue that this phenomenon is caused by two imbalances: semantic space level imbalance and training sample level imbalance. For this problem, we propose DB-SGG, an effective framework based on debiasing but not the conventional distribution fitting. It integrates two components: Semantic Debiasing (SD) and Balanced Predicate Learning (BPL), for these imbalances. SD utilizes a confusion matrix and a bipartite graph to construct predicate relationships. BPL adopts a random undersampling strategy and an ambiguity removing strategy to focus on informative predicates. Benefiting from the model-agnostic process, our method can be easily applied to SGG models and outperforms Transformer by <InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="11263_2025_2365_Article_IEq1.gif" Format="GIF" Height="16" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="51" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(136.3\%\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mn>136.3</mn> <mo>%</mo> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, <InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="11263_2025_2365_Article_IEq2.gif" Format="GIF" Height="16" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="51" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(119.5\%\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mn>119.5</mn> <mo>%</mo> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, and <InlineEquation ID="IEq3"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="11263_2025_2365_Article_IEq3.gif" Format="GIF" Height="16" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="51" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(122.6\%\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mn>122.6</mn> <mo>%</mo> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> on mR@20 at three SGG sub-tasks on the SGG-VG dataset. Our method is further verified on another complex SGG dataset (SGG-GQA) and two downstream tasks (sentence-to-graph retrieval and image captioning).</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Informative Scene Graph Generation via Debiasing

  • Lianli Gao,
  • Xinyu Lyu,
  • Yuyu Guo,
  • Yuxuan Hu,
  • Yuan-Fang Li,
  • Lu Xu,
  • Heng Tao Shen,
  • Jingkuan Song

摘要

Scene graph generation aims to detect visual relationship triplets, (subject, predicate, object). Due to biases in data, current models tend to predict common predicates, e.g., “on” and “at”, instead of informative ones, e.g., “standing on” and “looking at”. This tendency results in the loss of precise information and overall performance. If a model only uses “stone on road” rather than “stone blocking road” to describe an image, it may be a grave misunderstanding. We argue that this phenomenon is caused by two imbalances: semantic space level imbalance and training sample level imbalance. For this problem, we propose DB-SGG, an effective framework based on debiasing but not the conventional distribution fitting. It integrates two components: Semantic Debiasing (SD) and Balanced Predicate Learning (BPL), for these imbalances. SD utilizes a confusion matrix and a bipartite graph to construct predicate relationships. BPL adopts a random undersampling strategy and an ambiguity removing strategy to focus on informative predicates. Benefiting from the model-agnostic process, our method can be easily applied to SGG models and outperforms Transformer by \(136.3\%\) 136.3 % , \(119.5\%\) 119.5 % , and \(122.6\%\) 122.6 % on mR@20 at three SGG sub-tasks on the SGG-VG dataset. Our method is further verified on another complex SGG dataset (SGG-GQA) and two downstream tasks (sentence-to-graph retrieval and image captioning).