Scholarlink

<p>This study aims to deepen the theoretical foundations of debriefing in simulation-based pedagogy. By applying distributed cognition (DCog), we analyse a case of a simulation debriefing with nursing students. Using transcribed excerpts from video recordings, our cognitive ethnography shows how debriefing conversations function as a coordination device for two key processes: joint conversational remembering and distributed metacognition. According to our model, debriefing conversations coordinate a cascade of representations of simulated events. This cascade enables participants to engage reflexively with past actions, transforming these into shared learning opportunities. Reframing the trajectory of public representation in debriefing conversations in terms of DCog reveals new insights into the cognitive consequences of debriefing practices and how they can be developed. We highlight the importance of enabling multiple viewpoints and shared cognitive resources for epistemic outcomes, while also challenging students’ assumptions and foster critical thinking skills.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Debriefing as epistemic engineering: conversational remembering and socially distributed metacognition in healthcare simulation

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年12月4日

查看全文
  • Mads Solberg,
  • Charlott Sellberg

摘要

This study aims to deepen the theoretical foundations of debriefing in simulation-based pedagogy. By applying distributed cognition (DCog), we analyse a case of a simulation debriefing with nursing students. Using transcribed excerpts from video recordings, our cognitive ethnography shows how debriefing conversations function as a coordination device for two key processes: joint conversational remembering and distributed metacognition. According to our model, debriefing conversations coordinate a cascade of representations of simulated events. This cascade enables participants to engage reflexively with past actions, transforming these into shared learning opportunities. Reframing the trajectory of public representation in debriefing conversations in terms of DCog reveals new insights into the cognitive consequences of debriefing practices and how they can be developed. We highlight the importance of enabling multiple viewpoints and shared cognitive resources for epistemic outcomes, while also challenging students’ assumptions and foster critical thinking skills.