<p>Church-Fitch’s Knowability Paradox points to a necessary correlation between ignorance and unknowability. In this paper, we investigate the prospects of quantifying this correlation. We explore various approaches to formalizing the quantitative correlation between unknowns and unknowables and advocate for a specific proposal. Our proposal appeals to the density of true unknowables given the ratio of known to unknown basic truths in a situation. A higher proportion of known basic truths in a situation corresponds to a lower density of true unknowables in that situation. We further examine some implications of this result and discuss potential applications to other philosophical debates.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Counting unknowables

  • Davide Fassio,
  • Massimiliano Carrara

摘要

Church-Fitch’s Knowability Paradox points to a necessary correlation between ignorance and unknowability. In this paper, we investigate the prospects of quantifying this correlation. We explore various approaches to formalizing the quantitative correlation between unknowns and unknowables and advocate for a specific proposal. Our proposal appeals to the density of true unknowables given the ratio of known to unknown basic truths in a situation. A higher proportion of known basic truths in a situation corresponds to a lower density of true unknowables in that situation. We further examine some implications of this result and discuss potential applications to other philosophical debates.