<p><InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\textsf{BS4}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="sans-serif">BS</mi> <mn mathvariant="sans-serif">4</mn> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> is a natural Belnapian conservative extension of Lewis’ modal system <InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\textsf{S4}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="sans-serif">S</mi> <mn mathvariant="sans-serif">4</mn> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> via strong negation. In [<CitationRef CitationID="CR23">23</CitationRef>] it was proved that the translation <InlineEquation ID="IEq3"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\textrm{T}_{\textbf{B}}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mtext>T</mtext> <mi mathvariant="bold">B</mi> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> that naturally generalises the Gödel–Tarski translation <InlineEquation ID="IEq4"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\textrm{T}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mtext>T</mtext> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> embeds faithfully Nelson’s logic <InlineEquation ID="IEq5"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\textsf{N4}^{\bot }\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="sans-serif">N</mi> <msup> <mn mathvariant="sans-serif">4</mn> <mi>⊥</mi> </msup> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> into <InlineEquation ID="IEq6"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\textsf{BS4}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="sans-serif">BS</mi> <mn mathvariant="sans-serif">4</mn> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. So it is natural to define a modal companion of a logic extending <InlineEquation ID="IEq7"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\textsf{N4}^{\bot }\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="sans-serif">N</mi> <msup> <mn mathvariant="sans-serif">4</mn> <mi>⊥</mi> </msup> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> as an extension of <InlineEquation ID="IEq8"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\textsf{BS4}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="sans-serif">BS</mi> <mn mathvariant="sans-serif">4</mn> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. In this paper we construct a representation of an <InlineEquation ID="IEq9"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\textsf{N4}^{\bot }\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="sans-serif">N</mi> <msup> <mn mathvariant="sans-serif">4</mn> <mi>⊥</mi> </msup> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>-lattice similar to the representation of a Heyting algebra as an open elements algebra for a suitable topoboolean algebra. Using this algebraic result we construct a wide class of <InlineEquation ID="IEq10"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\textsf{N4}^{\bot }\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="sans-serif">N</mi> <msup> <mn mathvariant="sans-serif">4</mn> <mi>⊥</mi> </msup> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>-extensions, elements of which have modal companions. In particular, all <InlineEquation ID="IEq11"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\textsf{N3}^\bot \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="sans-serif">N</mi> <msup> <mn mathvariant="sans-serif">3</mn> <mi>⊥</mi> </msup> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>-extensions have modal companions. Also we prove that there are a continuum of <InlineEquation ID="IEq12"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\textsf{N4}^{\bot }\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="sans-serif">N</mi> <msup> <mn mathvariant="sans-serif">4</mn> <mi>⊥</mi> </msup> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>-extensions that have no modal companions.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

On Modal Companions of Logics with Strong Negation

  • Dmitry M. Anishchenko

摘要

\(\textsf{BS4}\) BS 4 is a natural Belnapian conservative extension of Lewis’ modal system \(\textsf{S4}\) S 4 via strong negation. In [23] it was proved that the translation \(\textrm{T}_{\textbf{B}}\) T B that naturally generalises the Gödel–Tarski translation \(\textrm{T}\) T embeds faithfully Nelson’s logic \(\textsf{N4}^{\bot }\) N 4 into \(\textsf{BS4}\) BS 4 . So it is natural to define a modal companion of a logic extending \(\textsf{N4}^{\bot }\) N 4 as an extension of \(\textsf{BS4}\) BS 4 . In this paper we construct a representation of an \(\textsf{N4}^{\bot }\) N 4 -lattice similar to the representation of a Heyting algebra as an open elements algebra for a suitable topoboolean algebra. Using this algebraic result we construct a wide class of \(\textsf{N4}^{\bot }\) N 4 -extensions, elements of which have modal companions. In particular, all \(\textsf{N3}^\bot \) N 3 -extensions have modal companions. Also we prove that there are a continuum of \(\textsf{N4}^{\bot }\) N 4 -extensions that have no modal companions.