Scholarlink

<p>In the face of contentious histories of philosophy, philosophical didactics can shed light on philosophical education in critical and innovative ways. Two case studies will be used to examine and question the relationship between philosophy and its history: Rorty’s Dewey and Cavell’s Emerson. By analyzing them as philosophical figures of thought and distinguishing between hostile and critical philosophical ways of reading, on the one hand, and conservative and innovative philosophical ways of reading, on the other, it is possible to elucidate approaches that are capable of eliciting a particular kind of conceptual critique about philosophical education, which can be called “philosophical sincerity.”</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Conceptual Criticism about Philosophical Education

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年12月12日

查看全文
  • Stefano Franceschini

摘要

In the face of contentious histories of philosophy, philosophical didactics can shed light on philosophical education in critical and innovative ways. Two case studies will be used to examine and question the relationship between philosophy and its history: Rorty’s Dewey and Cavell’s Emerson. By analyzing them as philosophical figures of thought and distinguishing between hostile and critical philosophical ways of reading, on the one hand, and conservative and innovative philosophical ways of reading, on the other, it is possible to elucidate approaches that are capable of eliciting a particular kind of conceptual critique about philosophical education, which can be called “philosophical sincerity.”