<p>The philosophical Sixtiers (<i>shestidesiatniki</i>) were a cohort of Soviet thinkers who emerged during the Khrushchev Thaw and played a decisive role in revitalizing philosophical life under conditions of ideological pressure and political control. This paper argues that they are best understood not through the lens of generational identity, but through the lens of the enduring struggle between philosophy and power. What united them was not age or shared experience as such, but a sustained commitment to preserving philosophy as an autonomous practice of critical thinking, grounded in intellectual rigor and moral responsibility, in a context where thought was subject to political instrumentalization. The paper traces how this commitment took shape in a normative reorientation of philosophy, expressed in a critical engagement with the young Marx, methodological innovation, and the development of indirect forms of critique. It then examines the limits of this achievement, showing how the shift from ideological coercion to institutional incorporation during <i>perestroika</i> transformed the conditions of philosophical practice and weakened the critical independence that had defined the Sixtiers’ work. By reconstructing this trajectory, the paper highlights both the achievements and the vulnerability of philosophical autonomy. The legacy of the philosophical Sixtiers thus offers a critical perspective on the contemporary Russian situation, where philosophy once again confronts pressures of political instrumentalization and renewed entanglement with state power, raising urgent questions about the conditions under which critical thought can be sustained.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

The philosophical Sixtiers: their legacy and important lessons

  • Marina F. Bykova

摘要

The philosophical Sixtiers (shestidesiatniki) were a cohort of Soviet thinkers who emerged during the Khrushchev Thaw and played a decisive role in revitalizing philosophical life under conditions of ideological pressure and political control. This paper argues that they are best understood not through the lens of generational identity, but through the lens of the enduring struggle between philosophy and power. What united them was not age or shared experience as such, but a sustained commitment to preserving philosophy as an autonomous practice of critical thinking, grounded in intellectual rigor and moral responsibility, in a context where thought was subject to political instrumentalization. The paper traces how this commitment took shape in a normative reorientation of philosophy, expressed in a critical engagement with the young Marx, methodological innovation, and the development of indirect forms of critique. It then examines the limits of this achievement, showing how the shift from ideological coercion to institutional incorporation during perestroika transformed the conditions of philosophical practice and weakened the critical independence that had defined the Sixtiers’ work. By reconstructing this trajectory, the paper highlights both the achievements and the vulnerability of philosophical autonomy. The legacy of the philosophical Sixtiers thus offers a critical perspective on the contemporary Russian situation, where philosophy once again confronts pressures of political instrumentalization and renewed entanglement with state power, raising urgent questions about the conditions under which critical thought can be sustained.