<p>The galactic cosmic ray (GCR) unidirectional latitudinal gradient (<InlineEquation ID="IEq3"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="11207_2025_2555_Article_IEq3.gif" Format="GIF" Height="16" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="26" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi>G</mi> <mi mathvariant="normal">⊥</mi> </msub> </math></EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="TEX">$G_{\bot }$</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>) is important for the understanding of the physical mechanism of solar modulation in the three-dimensional heliosphere. This work calculates the south-north (SN) asymmetry the GCR intensity from six neutron monitor (NM) stations with different geographic locations and cutoff rigidities (<InlineEquation ID="IEq4"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="11207_2025_2555_Article_IEq4.gif" Format="GIF" Height="16" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="18" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi>P</mi> <mi mathvariant="normal">c</mi> </msub> </math></EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="TEX">$P_{\mathrm{c}}$</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>). The <InlineEquation ID="IEq5"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="11207_2025_2555_Article_IEq4.gif" Format="GIF" Height="16" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="18" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi>P</mi> <mi mathvariant="normal">c</mi> </msub> </math></EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="TEX">$P_{\mathrm{c}}$</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> values are divided into three groups: low <InlineEquation ID="IEq6"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="11207_2025_2555_Article_IEq4.gif" Format="GIF" Height="16" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="18" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi>P</mi> <mi mathvariant="normal">c</mi> </msub> </math></EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="TEX">$P_{\mathrm{c}}$</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> (1 – 5&#xa0;GV) for the McMurdo and Thule NMs, medium <InlineEquation ID="IEq7"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="11207_2025_2555_Article_IEq4.gif" Format="GIF" Height="16" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="18" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi>P</mi> <mi mathvariant="normal">c</mi> </msub> </math></EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="TEX">$P_{\mathrm{c}}$</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> (6 – 11&#xa0;GV) for the Tsumeb NM and Mexico NM, and high <InlineEquation ID="IEq8"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="11207_2025_2555_Article_IEq4.gif" Format="GIF" Height="16" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="18" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi>P</mi> <mi mathvariant="normal">c</mi> </msub> </math></EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="TEX">$P_{\mathrm{c}}$</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> (&gt; 12&#xa0;GV) for the Haleakala NM and Princess Sirindhorn NM. The SN GCR intensities are corrected by the secular change method and the heliospheric current sheet (HCS) tilt angle for Earth’s excursions in helio-latitudes to calculate the unidirectional latitudinal gradients (<InlineEquation ID="IEq9"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="11207_2025_2555_Article_IEq3.gif" Format="GIF" Height="16" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="26" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi>G</mi> <mi mathvariant="normal">⊥</mi> </msub> </math></EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="TEX">$G_{\bot }$</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>) in the course of solar rotations during the <InlineEquation ID="IEq10"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="11207_2025_2555_Article_IEq1.gif" Format="GIF" Height="14" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="45" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi>A</mi> <mo>&gt;</mo> <mn>0</mn> </math></EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="TEX">$A &gt; 0$</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> (1996 – 1998 and 2015 – 2019) and <InlineEquation ID="IEq11"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="11207_2025_2555_Article_IEq2.gif" Format="GIF" Height="14" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="45" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi>A</mi> <mo>&lt;</mo> <mn>0</mn> </math></EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="TEX">$A &lt; 0$</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> epochs (2004 – 2008). We find that the directions of <InlineEquation ID="IEq12"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="11207_2025_2555_Article_IEq3.gif" Format="GIF" Height="16" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="26" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi>G</mi> <mi mathvariant="normal">⊥</mi> </msub> </math></EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="TEX">$G_{\bot }$</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> are opposite to the (north-South) NS offset of the HCS. The effect of the asymmetric HCS tilt on the <InlineEquation ID="IEq13"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="11207_2025_2555_Article_IEq3.gif" Format="GIF" Height="16" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="26" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi>G</mi> <mi mathvariant="normal">⊥</mi> </msub> </math></EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="TEX">$G_{\bot }$</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> is more prominent in the <InlineEquation ID="IEq14"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="11207_2025_2555_Article_IEq2.gif" Format="GIF" Height="14" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="45" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi>A</mi> <mo>&lt;</mo> <mn>0</mn> </math></EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="TEX">$A &lt; 0$</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> than in the <InlineEquation ID="IEq15"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="11207_2025_2555_Article_IEq1.gif" Format="GIF" Height="14" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="45" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi>A</mi> <mo>&gt;</mo> <mn>0</mn> </math></EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="TEX">$A &gt; 0$</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> epochs. The NS asymmetry in the HCS tilt and solar wind speed simultaneously contribute to the <InlineEquation ID="IEq16"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="11207_2025_2555_Article_IEq3.gif" Format="GIF" Height="16" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="26" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi>G</mi> <mi mathvariant="normal">⊥</mi> </msub> </math></EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="TEX">$G_{\bot }$</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> throughout both magnetic polarities. When the asymmetric solar wind speed is absent, the effect of the asymmetric HCS tilt on the <InlineEquation ID="IEq17"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="11207_2025_2555_Article_IEq3.gif" Format="GIF" Height="16" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="26" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi>G</mi> <mi mathvariant="normal">⊥</mi> </msub> </math></EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="TEX">$G_{\bot }$</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> is clearly observed in the <InlineEquation ID="IEq18"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="11207_2025_2555_Article_IEq2.gif" Format="GIF" Height="14" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="45" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi>A</mi> <mo>&lt;</mo> <mn>0</mn> </math></EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="TEX">$A &lt; 0$</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> epoch not in the <InlineEquation ID="IEq19"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="11207_2025_2555_Article_IEq1.gif" Format="GIF" Height="14" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="45" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi>A</mi> <mo>&gt;</mo> <mn>0</mn> </math></EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="TEX">$A &gt; 0$</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> epochs, and the magnitudes of <InlineEquation ID="IEq20"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="11207_2025_2555_Article_IEq3.gif" Format="GIF" Height="16" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="26" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi>G</mi> <mi mathvariant="normal">⊥</mi> </msub> </math></EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="TEX">$G_{\bot }$</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> are proportional to the size of the offset. However, when the asymmetric HCS tilt is none, the effect of the NS asymmetric solar wind speed on <InlineEquation ID="IEq21"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="11207_2025_2555_Article_IEq3.gif" Format="GIF" Height="16" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="26" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi>G</mi> <mi mathvariant="normal">⊥</mi> </msub> </math></EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="TEX">$G_{\bot }$</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> cannot be discriminated in both magnetic polarities. The slope of the SN asymmetric GCR intensity to the asymmetric solar wind speed in the <InlineEquation ID="IEq22"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="11207_2025_2555_Article_IEq1.gif" Format="GIF" Height="14" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="45" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi>A</mi> <mo>&gt;</mo> <mn>0</mn> </math></EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="TEX">$A &gt; 0$</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> (2015 – 2019) is larger than in the <InlineEquation ID="IEq23"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="11207_2025_2555_Article_IEq2.gif" Format="GIF" Height="14" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="45" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi>A</mi> <mo>&lt;</mo> <mn>0</mn> </math></EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="TEX">$A &lt; 0$</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> by about 1.3 – 1.8 times. The yearly GCR asymmetric latitudinal gradients tend to depend on directions of the HCS and solar wind speed offsets rather than on the solar magnetic polarities. The rigidity and asymptotic dependences of the <InlineEquation ID="IEq24"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="11207_2025_2555_Article_IEq3.gif" Format="GIF" Height="16" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="26" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi>G</mi> <mi mathvariant="normal">⊥</mi> </msub> </math></EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="TEX">$G_{\bot }$</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> are discussed.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Study of North-South Asymmetric Corotating Solar Wind Structures and Rigidity Dependences of Galactic Cosmic Ray Unidirectional Latitudinal Gradient in \(A > 0\) and \(A < 0\) Magnetic Polarities

  • Cherdchai Wuttiya,
  • Thana Yeeram

摘要

The galactic cosmic ray (GCR) unidirectional latitudinal gradient ( G $G_{\bot }$ ) is important for the understanding of the physical mechanism of solar modulation in the three-dimensional heliosphere. This work calculates the south-north (SN) asymmetry the GCR intensity from six neutron monitor (NM) stations with different geographic locations and cutoff rigidities ( P c $P_{\mathrm{c}}$ ). The P c $P_{\mathrm{c}}$ values are divided into three groups: low P c $P_{\mathrm{c}}$ (1 – 5 GV) for the McMurdo and Thule NMs, medium P c $P_{\mathrm{c}}$ (6 – 11 GV) for the Tsumeb NM and Mexico NM, and high P c $P_{\mathrm{c}}$ (> 12 GV) for the Haleakala NM and Princess Sirindhorn NM. The SN GCR intensities are corrected by the secular change method and the heliospheric current sheet (HCS) tilt angle for Earth’s excursions in helio-latitudes to calculate the unidirectional latitudinal gradients ( G $G_{\bot }$ ) in the course of solar rotations during the A > 0 $A > 0$ (1996 – 1998 and 2015 – 2019) and A < 0 $A < 0$ epochs (2004 – 2008). We find that the directions of G $G_{\bot }$ are opposite to the (north-South) NS offset of the HCS. The effect of the asymmetric HCS tilt on the G $G_{\bot }$ is more prominent in the A < 0 $A < 0$ than in the A > 0 $A > 0$ epochs. The NS asymmetry in the HCS tilt and solar wind speed simultaneously contribute to the G $G_{\bot }$ throughout both magnetic polarities. When the asymmetric solar wind speed is absent, the effect of the asymmetric HCS tilt on the G $G_{\bot }$ is clearly observed in the A < 0 $A < 0$ epoch not in the A > 0 $A > 0$ epochs, and the magnitudes of G $G_{\bot }$ are proportional to the size of the offset. However, when the asymmetric HCS tilt is none, the effect of the NS asymmetric solar wind speed on G $G_{\bot }$ cannot be discriminated in both magnetic polarities. The slope of the SN asymmetric GCR intensity to the asymmetric solar wind speed in the A > 0 $A > 0$ (2015 – 2019) is larger than in the A < 0 $A < 0$ by about 1.3 – 1.8 times. The yearly GCR asymmetric latitudinal gradients tend to depend on directions of the HCS and solar wind speed offsets rather than on the solar magnetic polarities. The rigidity and asymptotic dependences of the G $G_{\bot }$ are discussed.