Scholarlink

<p>This study investigates everyday practices that households utilize to improve or maintain their livelihoods. Drawing on prior qualitative research across various European economies, we developed a new survey tool, which was deployed within a larger survey encompassing the entire economic spectrum of German households. Using explorative factor analysis, we identified four overarching livelihood strategies employed by households: budget management, subsistence production, the liquidation of household assets, and the parsimonious procurement of essentials. Our results indicate a differential prevalence of these strategies, with a notable frequency among low-income households, although they are not exclusive to this group. The study reveals that both objective economic factors, such as income and material deprivation, and assessments of a household’s past economic downturn and pessimistic future economic expectations influence the likelihood of adopting these livelihood strategies. However, certain indicators are more strongly predictive of specific strategies, such as parsimonious procurement of essentials is associated with lower household income and material deprivation while liquidation of household assets is closely associated with experiences of economic downturns.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

What Do Households Do when Things Are Rough?? Economic Situation, Pessimistic Economic Expectations and the Use of Livelihood Practices

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年4月11日

查看全文
  • Juliane Achatz,
  • Anton Nivorozhkin,
  • Markus Promberger,
  • Brigitte Schels

摘要

This study investigates everyday practices that households utilize to improve or maintain their livelihoods. Drawing on prior qualitative research across various European economies, we developed a new survey tool, which was deployed within a larger survey encompassing the entire economic spectrum of German households. Using explorative factor analysis, we identified four overarching livelihood strategies employed by households: budget management, subsistence production, the liquidation of household assets, and the parsimonious procurement of essentials. Our results indicate a differential prevalence of these strategies, with a notable frequency among low-income households, although they are not exclusive to this group. The study reveals that both objective economic factors, such as income and material deprivation, and assessments of a household’s past economic downturn and pessimistic future economic expectations influence the likelihood of adopting these livelihood strategies. However, certain indicators are more strongly predictive of specific strategies, such as parsimonious procurement of essentials is associated with lower household income and material deprivation while liquidation of household assets is closely associated with experiences of economic downturns.