Scholarlink

<p>Drs. Oliva and Cassas assert in their paper that the magmatic bodies I dated using biostratigraphic methods are intrusions. However, magmatic materials are actually volcanic products, not intrusions. The dating of volcanic bodies was done indirectly; I dated the pre- and post-volcanic sediments, and then inferred the age of the volcanic bodies based on those dates. This method cannot be applied to&#xa0;intrusive bodies.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Comments on the Article “Magnetic Signature of the Camarena de la Sierra Jurassic Magmatism in the SE Iberian Chain (Teruel, Spain)” by Belén Oliva-Urcia and Antonio Cassas-Sainz

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2026年3月1日

查看全文
  • José Emilio Cortés

摘要

Drs. Oliva and Cassas assert in their paper that the magmatic bodies I dated using biostratigraphic methods are intrusions. However, magmatic materials are actually volcanic products, not intrusions. The dating of volcanic bodies was done indirectly; I dated the pre- and post-volcanic sediments, and then inferred the age of the volcanic bodies based on those dates. This method cannot be applied to intrusive bodies.