Scholarlink

<p>This article investigates the conceptual genesis, structural methodology, and projected socio-legal implications of the ʔawdə-t’ɨbəbawi jəhigg məzgəbə k’alat (Encyclopedic Law Dictionary), this bilingual (Amharic/English) reference work specifically engineered for the Ethiopian legal landscape. The research situates this lexicographical intervention within a framework of historical and contemporary systemic challenges, including pervasive linguistic barriers, cultural incongruities, dialectal variations, and pedagogical disparities in legal education. These factors have long necessitated a centralized, authoritative resource to bridge the gap between indigenous linguistic contexts and modern legal requirements. By establishing standardized, academically rigorous definitions for over 4000 legal terms, the dictionary functions as a critical mechanism for mitigating semiotic ambiguity and developing a harmonized interpretive framework. This standardization is essential for ensuring consistency across legal discourse, benefiting judicial practitioners, scholars, and the broader citizenry. Consequently, this study argues that the development of such an encyclopedic resource transcends mere linguistic documentation, and it serves as a foundational instrument for fortifying the rule of law, enhancing procedural transparency, and expanding equitable access to justice within Ethiopia’s complex federal system.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Pioneering Legal Lexicography, the Ethiopian Encyclopedic Law Dictionary and Its Transformative Impact

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2026年5月26日

查看全文
  • Zinawork Assefa,
  • Yohannes Adigeh

摘要

This article investigates the conceptual genesis, structural methodology, and projected socio-legal implications of the ʔawdə-t’ɨbəbawi jəhigg məzgəbə k’alat (Encyclopedic Law Dictionary), this bilingual (Amharic/English) reference work specifically engineered for the Ethiopian legal landscape. The research situates this lexicographical intervention within a framework of historical and contemporary systemic challenges, including pervasive linguistic barriers, cultural incongruities, dialectal variations, and pedagogical disparities in legal education. These factors have long necessitated a centralized, authoritative resource to bridge the gap between indigenous linguistic contexts and modern legal requirements. By establishing standardized, academically rigorous definitions for over 4000 legal terms, the dictionary functions as a critical mechanism for mitigating semiotic ambiguity and developing a harmonized interpretive framework. This standardization is essential for ensuring consistency across legal discourse, benefiting judicial practitioners, scholars, and the broader citizenry. Consequently, this study argues that the development of such an encyclopedic resource transcends mere linguistic documentation, and it serves as a foundational instrument for fortifying the rule of law, enhancing procedural transparency, and expanding equitable access to justice within Ethiopia’s complex federal system.