<p>This paper presents Biblium, a Python library for bibliometric and scientometric analysis that introduces a formal framework for comparative group analysis—a capability largely absent from existing bibliometric software. The library’s primary methodological contribution is the BiblioGroup framework, which enables researchers to (1) organize bibliographic datasets into user-defined, potentially overlapping subgroups, (2) perform association testing with standardized residuals to quantify how bibliometric entities distinguish between groups, (3) apply correspondence analysis for dimensionality reduction of group–entity relationships, and (4) classify documents into groups using multiple machine learning algorithms. These capabilities address a fundamental analytical question in comparative scientometrics: what statistically distinguishes one subset of publications from another? Biblium also provides a comprehensive analytical environment supporting six major bibliographic databases (Scopus, Web of Science, OpenAlex, PubMed, Dimensions, Lens.org), descriptive bibliometrics, network analysis, temporal dynamics, and a graphical user interface for researchers without programming expertise. Cross-library consistency testing against five established Python bibliometric libraries demonstrated agreement on all compared metrics. Biblium is openly available on GitHub and PyPI.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Biblium: a Python library for comparative bibliometric analysis

  • Lan Umek

摘要

This paper presents Biblium, a Python library for bibliometric and scientometric analysis that introduces a formal framework for comparative group analysis—a capability largely absent from existing bibliometric software. The library’s primary methodological contribution is the BiblioGroup framework, which enables researchers to (1) organize bibliographic datasets into user-defined, potentially overlapping subgroups, (2) perform association testing with standardized residuals to quantify how bibliometric entities distinguish between groups, (3) apply correspondence analysis for dimensionality reduction of group–entity relationships, and (4) classify documents into groups using multiple machine learning algorithms. These capabilities address a fundamental analytical question in comparative scientometrics: what statistically distinguishes one subset of publications from another? Biblium also provides a comprehensive analytical environment supporting six major bibliographic databases (Scopus, Web of Science, OpenAlex, PubMed, Dimensions, Lens.org), descriptive bibliometrics, network analysis, temporal dynamics, and a graphical user interface for researchers without programming expertise. Cross-library consistency testing against five established Python bibliometric libraries demonstrated agreement on all compared metrics. Biblium is openly available on GitHub and PyPI.